Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366504›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Kidney Transplant-Associated Viral Infection Rates and Outcomes in a Single-Centre Cohort.

Kairi Pullerits, Shona Garland, Sharmilee Rengarajan, Malcolm Guiver, Rajkumar Chinnadurai, Rachel J Middleton, Chukwuma A Chukwu, Philip A Kalra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanisms and Determinants of CMV Reactivation in Kidney Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kairi PulleritsDepartment of Undergraduate Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0296-6939
Shona GarlandDepartment of Undergraduate Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Sharmilee RengarajanDepartment of Nephrology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
Malcolm GuiverDepartment of Virology Manchester, University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
Rajkumar ChinnaduraiDepartment of Nephrology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-6595
Rachel J MiddletonDepartment of Nephrology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
Chukwuma A ChukwuDepartment of Nephrology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-2256
Philip A KalraDepartment of Nephrology, Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
University of Manchester · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpportunistic infections remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the incidence and predictors of post-transplant DNA virus infections (CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV infections) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) at a single tertiary centre and evaluate their impact on graft outcomes.

methodsKTR transplanted between 2000 and 2021 were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to identify factors associated with DNA virus infections and their impact on allograft outcomes respectively. A sub-analysis of individual viral infections was also conducted to describe the pattern, timing, interventions, and outcomes of individual infections.

resultsData from 962 recipients were evaluated (Mean age 47.3 ± 15 years, 62% male, 81% white). 30% of recipients (288/962) had infection(s) by one or more of the DNA viruses. Individually, CMV, EBV, BKV and JCV viruses were diagnosed in 13.8%. 11.3%, 8.9% and 4.4% of recipients respectively. Factors associated with increased risk of post-transplant DNA virus infection included recipient female gender, higher number of HLA mismatch, lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), CMV seropositive donor, maintenance with cyclosporin (rather than tacrolimus) and higher number of maintenance immunosuppressive medications. The slope of eGFR decline was steeper in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection irrespective of the virus type. Further, GFR declined faster with an increasing number of different viral infections. Death-censored graft loss adjusted for age, gender, total HLA mismatch, baseline eGFR and acute rejection was significantly higher in recipients with a history of DNA virus infection than those without infection (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR, 1.74, 95% CI, 1.08-2.80)). In contrast, dialysis-free survival did not differ between the two groups of recipients (aHR, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.88-1.47).

conclusionPost-transplant DNA viral infection is associated with a higher risk of allograft loss. Careful management of immunosuppression and close surveillance of at-risk recipients may improve graft outcomes.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsKidney TransplantationPolyomavirus InfectionsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTacrolimusTacrolimusBKV viremiaCMV viremiaEBV viremiaJCV viremiakidney transplantation

Identifiers

PMID36366504
PMCPMC9695979
OpenAlexW4307939653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.