Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366499›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Rapid Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 Spike Mutation F486V in Clinical Specimens Using a High-Resolution Melting-Based Assay.

Akira Aoki, Hirokazu Adachi, Yoko Mori, Miyabi Ito, Katsuhiko Sato, Masayoshi Kinoshita, Masahiro Kuriki, Kenji Okuda, Toru Sakakibara, Yoshinori Okamoto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nanobodies targeting SARS-CoV-2 variants.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Rapid detection and genotyping of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4/5 variants using a RT-PCR and CRISPR-Cas12a-based assay].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Akira AokiFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468-8503, Japan.
Hirokazu AdachiAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Yoko MoriFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468-8503, Japan.
Miyabi ItoAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Katsuhiko SatoAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Masayoshi KinoshitaAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Masahiro KurikiAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Kenji OkudaAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Toru SakakibaraAichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, 7-6 Nagare, Tsuji-machi, Kita-ku, Nagoya 462-8576, Japan.
Yoshinori OkamotoFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468-8503, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6031-3250
Hideto JinnoFaculty of Pharmacy, Meijo University, 150 Yagotoyama, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya 468-8503, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant BA.5 emerged as of February 2022 and replaced the earlier Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.2. COVID-19 genomic surveillance should be continued as new variants seem to subsequently appear, including post-BA.5 subvariants. A rapid assay is needed to differentiate between the currently dominant BA.5 variant and other variants. This study successfully developed a high-resolution melting (HRM)-based assay for BA.4/5-characteristic spike mutation F486V detection and demonstrated that our assay could discriminate between BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5 subvariants in clinical specimens. The mutational spectra at two regions (G446/L452 and F486) for the variant-selective HRM analysis was the focus of our assay. The mutational spectra used as the basis to identify each Omicron subvariant were as follows: BA.1 (G446S/L452/F486), BA.2 (G446/L452/F486), and BA.4/5 (G446/L452R/F486V). Upon mutation-coding RNA fragment analysis, the wild-type fragments melting curves were distinct from those of the mutant fragments. Based on the analysis of 120 clinical samples (40 each of subvariants BA.1, BA.2, and BA.5), this method's sensitivity and specificity were determined to be more than 95% and 100%, respectively. These results clearly demonstrate that this HRM-based assay is a simple screening method for monitoring Omicron subvariant evolution.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Biological AssayHumansMutationSensitivity and SpecificitySpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2BA.5F486V mutationhigh-resolution meltingOmicron subvariantsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID36366499
PMCPMC9696293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.