Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366442›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Clinics in Pakistan: A Multicentric, Prospective, Survey-Based Study.

Zia Ul Mustafa, Shazma Bashir, Arfah Shahid, Iqra Raees, Muhammad Salman, Hamid A Merchant, Mamoon A Aldeyab, Chia Siang Kow, Syed Shahzad Hasan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influences on Vaccine Decision-Making During Pregnancy.Journal of midwifery & women's health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Zia Ul MustafaDiscipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-4859
Shazma BashirSchool of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, Stratford Campus, London W1S 3PR, UK.
Arfah ShahidDepartment of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.
Iqra RaeesDepartment of Medicine, Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad SalmanInstitute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-1461
Hamid A MerchantDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-5013
Mamoon A AldeyabDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8148-7612
Chia Siang KowDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia.
Syed Shahzad HasanDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-2215
University of Huddersfield · GBIMU University · MYLahore College for Women University · PKPunjab Medical College · PKRawalpindi Medical University · PKUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the vaccination status and factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in the largest province of Pakistan. A multicentric, prospective, survey-based study using an interviewer-administered tool was conducted among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics between 1 December 2021 through 30 January 2022 across seven hospitals in Pakistan. The healthcare professionals providing care at the participating hospitals administered the survey. Four hundred and five pregnant women fully consented and completed the study. The majority of the study participants (70.6%, n = 286) were aged between 25 and 34 and had a previous successful pregnancy history. More than half of the study participants (56.0%, n = 227) did not receive COVID-19 vaccination at the time of data collection despite their family members (93.9%, n = 372) had already received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Among those who received COVID-19 vaccination (n = 173), vaccine efficacy, protection for the foetus, and risk of COVID-19-associated hospitalisation were the main driving factors for vaccine hesitancy. The majority of the unvaccinated women (77.8%, n = 182) had no intention of receiving the vaccine. However, more than two-thirds (85.7%, n = 342) consulted the doctor about COVID-19 vaccines, and most were recommended to receive COVID-19 vaccines by the doctors (80.7%, n = 280). Women were significantly more likely to be vaccinated if they had employment (odds ratio [OR] 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.31-8.64) compared with their counterparts who were homemakers, consulted their doctors (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.35), and if they did not have pregnancy-related issues (OR 6.02, 95% CI: 2.36-15.33). In this study, vaccine hesitancy was prevalent, and vaccine uptake was low among pregnant women. Education and employment did impact COVID vaccination uptake, emphasising the need for more targeted efforts to enhance the trust in vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPakistanPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesVaccinationVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesgestationMuslimpregnancySARS-CoV-2South Asiavaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID36366442
PMCPMC9694328
OpenAlexW4307550709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.