Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366378›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Rural-Urban Disparities in Vaccine Hesitancy among Adults in South Tyrol, Italy.

Verena Barbieri, Christian J Wiedermann, Stefano Lombardo, Barbara Plagg, Timon Gärtner, Dietmar Ausserhofer, Wolfgang Wiedermann, Adolf Engl, Giuliano Piccoliori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Verena BarbieriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Christian J WiedermannInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-8195
Stefano LombardoProvincial Institute for Statistics of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol (ASTAT), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Barbara PlaggInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Timon GärtnerProvincial Institute for Statistics of the Autonomous Province of Bolzano-South Tyrol (ASTAT), 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Dietmar AusserhoferInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Wolfgang WiedermannDepartment of Educational, School and Counseling Psychology, Missouri Prevention Science Institute, College of Education and Human Development, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Adolf EnglInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Giuliano PiccolioriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health, Claudiana-College of Health Professions, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe demographic determinants of hesitancy in Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) vaccination include rurality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. In the second year of the pandemic, in South Tyrol, Italy, 15.6 percent of a representative adult sample reported hesitancy. Individual factors responsible for greater vaccination hesitancy in rural areas of central Europe are poorly understood.

methodsA cross-sectional survey on a probability-based sample of South Tyrol residents in March 2021 was analyzed. The questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, COVID-19-related experiences, conspiracy thinking, and the likelihood of accepting the national vaccination plan. A logistic regression analysis was performed.

resultsAmong 1426 survey participants, 17.6% of the rural sample (

conclusionSeveral predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were more prevalent in rural areas than in urban areas, which may explain the lower vaccine uptake in rural areas. Rurality is not a determinant of vaccine hesitancy in the economically well-developed North of Italy.

Indexed as

COVID-19hesitancyprimary careruralityvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36366378
PMCPMC9692501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.