Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366374›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Evaluation of Conspiracy Beliefs, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Willingness to Pay towards COVID-19 Vaccines in Six Countries from Asian and African Regions: A Large Multinational Analysis.

Muhammad Salman, Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi, Nida Tanveer, Naureen Shehzadi, Humaira Majeed Khan, Zia Ul Mustafa, Tahir Mehmood Khan, Khalid Hussain, Malik Suliman Mohamed, Faheem Maqbool and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: Childhood vaccination and COVID-19.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Muhammad SalmanFaculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Institute of Pharmacy, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-1461
Tauqeer Hussain MallhiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9957-5362
Nida TanveerInstitute of Molecular Cardiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Naureen ShehzadiCollege of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Humaira Majeed KhanFaculty of Pharmaceutical and Allied Health Sciences, Institute of Pharmacy, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Zia Ul MustafaDepartment of Pharmacy Services, District Headquarter Hospital, Pakpattan 57400, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-4859
Tahir Mehmood KhanInstitute of Pharmaceutical Science, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Khalid HussainCollege of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-9627-8346
Malik Suliman MohamedDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8751-4159
Faheem MaqboolSchool of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.
Raja Ahsan AftabSchool of Pharmacy, Taylor's University, Selangor 47500, Malaysia.
Muhammad Hammad ButtDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4387-1351
Dibya Sundar PandaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8986-1100
Nasser Hadal AlotaibiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.
Amgad I M KhedrDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of pharmacy, Port Said University, Port Said 42526, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7658-4618
Abdullah Salah AlanaziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8120-4018
Ahmed D AlatawiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-9700
Abdulaziz Ibrahim AlzareaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0604-6299
Kishwar SulatanaFaculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, 1 km Defense Road, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Yusra Habib KhanDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Jouf University, Sakaka 72341, Al-Jouf Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-9479-6147
Jouf University · SALahore College for Women University · PKUniversity of the Punjab · PKPakistan Army · PKPort Said University · EGTaylor's University · MYThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Lahore · PKUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences · PKUppsala University · SE

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University DSR-2021-01-0336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination protects people from serious illness and associated complications. Conspiracy theories and misinformation on vaccines have been rampant during the COVID-19 pandemic and are considered significant drivers of vaccine hesitancy. Since vaccine hesitancy can undermine efforts to immunize the population against COVID-19 and interferes with the vaccination rate, this study aimed to ascertain the COVID-19-vaccine-related conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, views regarding vaccine mandates, and willingness to pay for vaccines among the general population. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted (April−August 2021) among the adult population in six countries (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, India, Malaysia, Sudan, and Egypt). Participants were recruited using an exponential, non-discriminate snowball sampling method. A validated self-completed electronic questionnaire was used for the data collection. All the participants responded to questions on various domains of the study instrument, including conspiracy beliefs, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to pay. The responses were scored according to predefined criteria and stratified into various groups. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 22. A total of 2481 responses were included in the study (Pakistan 24.1%, Saudi Arabia 19.5%, India 11.6%, Malaysia 8.1%, Sudan 19.3%, and Egypt 17.3%). There was a preponderance of participants ≤40 years old (18−25 years: 55.8%, 26−40 years: 28.5%) and females (57.1%). The average score of the COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy belief scale (C19V-CBS) was 2.30 ± 2.12 (median 2; range 0−7). Our analysis showed that 30% of the respondents were found to achieve the ideal score of zero, indicating no conspiracy belief. The mean score of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale (C19V-HS) was 25.93 ± 8.11 (range: 10−50). The majority (45.7%) had C19V-HA scores of 21−30 and nearly 28% achieved a score greater than 30, indicating a higher degree of hesitancy. There was a significant positive correlation between conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy (Spearman’s rho = 0.547, p < 0.001). Half of the study population were against the vaccine mandate. Respondents in favor of governmental enforcement of COVID-19 vaccines had significantly (p < 0.001) lower scores on the C19V-CBS and C19V-HS scale. Nearly 52% reported that they would only take vaccine if it were free, and only 24% were willing to pay for COVID-19 vaccines. A high prevalence of conspiracy beliefs and vaccine hesitancy was observed in the targeted countries. Our findings highlight the dire need for aggressive measures to counter the conspiracy beliefs and factors underlying this vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

AfricaAsiaconspiracy beliefsconspiracy theoriesCOVID-19vaccinationvaccine hesitancywillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID36366374
PMCPMC9694922
OpenAlexW4308444410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.