Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366288›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Adverse Reactions after the Third Dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine among Medical School Residents in a Regional Reference University Hospital in Italy.

Alborz Rahmani, Guglielmo Dini, Alfredo Montecucco, Andrea Orsi, Laura Sticchi, Alexander Domnich, Bianca Bruzzone, Luca Pellegrini, Alessia Manca, Matilde Ogliastro and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tuberculosis vaccines update: Is an RNA-based vaccine feasible for tuberculosis?International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Alborz RahmaniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Guglielmo DiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alfredo MontecuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Andrea OrsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2433-9610
Laura SticchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alexander DomnichHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-8892
Bianca BruzzoneHygiene Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Luca PellegriniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Alessia MancaOccupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Matilde OgliastroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Bruno Kusznir VitturiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Sonia ZacconiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Nicoletta DebarbieriOccupational Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Giancarlo IcardiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-8487
Paolo DurandoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-5176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent emergence of new variants of concern (VOCs) of SARS-CoV-2 and the uncertain duration of protection provided by the primary immunization cycle have highlighted the need for COVID-19 booster vaccinations. However, only a few studies have assessed the safety and reactogenicity profile of mRNA booster doses. Therefore, we conducted an online survey with the aim of assessing the adverse reaction profile in the 7 days following a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in a population of resident physicians who had already been investigated after the primary vaccination. Among the 512 resident physicians (female = 53.2%, mean age = 29.8 years) invited to participate in the survey, 222 completed the survey (56.5% female, mean age of 29.9 years), with an average time from second to third dose of 8.6 months. The most common adverse reactions were local pain (88.3%), fatigue (58.1%), muscle/joint pain (44.1%), and headache (38.3%), all subsiding in 48-72 h. While the local reaction rate was similar to that following the first two doses, the systemic reactions were considerably less common and milder compared to the second vaccination. Nonetheless, over one third (36.1%) of participants reported interference with their normal activities. These results complement our previous findings and could aid occupational and public health professionals in the counselling of vaccinees.

Indexed as

booster doseCOVID-19healthcare workersmRNA vaccineoccupational healthreactogenicity

Identifiers

PMID36366288
PMCPMC9695414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.