Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366096›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluation of Error-State Kalman Filter Method for Estimating Human Lower-Limb Kinematics during Various Walking Gaits.

Michael V Potter, Stephen M Cain, Lauro V Ojeda, Reed D Gurchiek, Ryan S McGinnis, Noel C Perkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael V PotterDepartment of Physics and Engineering, Francis Marion University, Florence, SC 29506, USA.
Stephen M CainDepartment of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1961-4195
Lauro V OjedaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-3293
Reed D GurchiekDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Ryan S McGinnisDepartment of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-6967
Noel C PerkinsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
University of Michigan · USFrancis Marion University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Vermont · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation DGE 1256260United States Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center W911QY-15-C-0053Vermont Space Grant Consortium NNX15AP86H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer an attractive way to study human lower-limb kinematics without traditional laboratory constraints. We present an error-state Kalman filter method to estimate 3D joint angles, joint angle ranges of motion, stride length, and step width using data from an array of seven body-worn IMUs. Importantly, this paper contributes a novel joint axis measurement correction that reduces joint angle drift errors without assumptions of strict hinge-like joint behaviors of the hip and knee. We evaluate the method compared to two optical motion capture methods on twenty human subjects performing six different types of walking gait consisting of forward walking (at three speeds), backward walking, and lateral walking (left and right). For all gaits, RMS differences in joint angle estimates generally remain below 5 degrees for all three ankle joint angles and for flexion/extension and abduction/adduction of the hips and knees when compared to estimates from reflective markers on the IMUs. Additionally, mean RMS differences in estimated stride length and step width remain below 0.13 m for all gait types, except stride length during slow walking. This study confirms the method's potential for non-laboratory based gait analysis, motivating further evaluation with IMU-only measurements and pathological gaits.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointLower Extremityabnormal gaitIMUmotion capturesensor fusion

Identifiers

PMID36366096
PMCPMC9654083
OpenAlexW4307922101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.