Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366064›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Classification of Holograms with 3D-CNN.

Dániel Terbe, László Orzó, Ákos Zarándy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dániel TerbeInstitute for Computer Science and Control, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-4685
László OrzóInstitute for Computer Science and Control, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos ZarándyInstitute for Computer Science and Control, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hologram, measured by using appropriate coherent illumination, records all substantial volumetric information of the measured sample. It is encoded in its interference patterns and, from these, the image of the sample objects can be reconstructed in different depths by using standard techniques of digital holography. We claim that a 2D convolutional network (CNN) cannot be efficient in decoding this volumetric information spread across the whole image as it inherently operates on local spatial features. Therefore, we propose a method, where we extract the volumetric information of the hologram by mapping it to a volume-using a standard wavefield propagation algorithm-and then feed it to a 3D-CNN-based architecture. We apply this method to a challenging real-life classification problem and compare its performance with an equivalent 2D-CNN counterpart. Furthermore, we inspect the robustness of the methods to slightly defocused inputs and find that the 3D method is inherently more robust in such cases. Additionally, we introduce a hologram-specific augmentation technique, called hologram defocus augmentation, that improves the performance of both methods for slightly defocused inputs. The proposed 3D-model outperforms the standard 2D method in classification accuracy both for in-focus and defocused input samples. Our results confirm and support our fundamental hypothesis that a 2D-CNN-based architecture is limited in the extraction of volumetric information globally encoded in the reconstructed hologram image.

Indexed as

HolographyImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, Computer3D-CNNCNNdeep learningdigital holographyneural networks

Identifiers

PMID36366064
PMCPMC9654288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.