Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366061›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Review of Automated Bioacoustics and General Acoustics Classification Research.

Leah Mutanu, Jeet Gohil, Khushi Gupta, Perpetua Wagio, Gerald Kotonya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah MutanuDepartment of Computing, United States International University Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 14634-0800, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-5164-6424
Jeet GohilDepartment of Computing, United States International University Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 14634-0800, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-1721-8837
Khushi GuptaDepartment of Computer Science, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA.
Perpetua WagioDepartment of Computing, United States International University Africa, Nairobi P.O. Box 14634-0800, Kenya.
Gerald KotonyaSchool of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lacaster LA1 4WA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated bioacoustics classification has received increasing attention from the research community in recent years due its cross-disciplinary nature and its diverse application. Applications in bioacoustics classification range from smart acoustic sensor networks that investigate the effects of acoustic vocalizations on species to context-aware edge devices that anticipate changes in their environment adapt their sensing and processing accordingly. The research described here is an in-depth survey of the current state of bioacoustics classification and monitoring. The survey examines bioacoustics classification alongside general acoustics to provide a representative picture of the research landscape. The survey reviewed 124 studies spanning eight years of research. The survey identifies the key application areas in bioacoustics research and the techniques used in audio transformation and feature extraction. The survey also examines the classification algorithms used in bioacoustics systems. Lastly, the survey examines current challenges, possible opportunities, and future directions in bioacoustics.

Indexed as

AcousticsAlgorithmsacoustic detectionbioacousticsgeneral acousticsreviewsound classificationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID36366061
PMCPMC9658612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.