Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366045›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Improving the Reliability of Scale-Free Image Morphometrics in Applications with Minimally Restrained Livestock Using Projective Geometry and Unsupervised Machine Learning.

Catherine McVey, Daniel Egger, Pablo Pinedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine McVeyDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5166-3371
Daniel EggerPratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Pablo PinedoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7111-3377

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in neural networks have garnered growing interest in applications of machine vision in livestock management, but simpler landmark-based approaches suitable for small, early stage exploratory studies still represent a critical stepping stone towards these more sophisticated analyses. While such approaches are well-validated for calibrated images, the practical limitations of such imaging systems restrict their applicability in working farm environments. The aim of this study was to validate novel algorithmic approaches to improving the reliability of scale-free image biometrics acquired from uncalibrated images of minimally restrained livestock. Using a database of 551 facial images acquired from 108 dairy cows, we demonstrate that, using a simple geometric projection-based approach to metric extraction, a priori knowledge may be leveraged to produce more intuitive and reliable morphometric measurements than conventional informationally complete Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Where uncontrolled variations in image annotation, camera position, and animal pose could not be fully controlled through the design of morphometrics, we further demonstrate how modern unsupervised machine learning tools may be used to leverage the systematic error structures created by such lurking variables in order to generate bias correction terms that may subsequently be used to improve the reliability of downstream statistical analyses and dimension reduction.

Indexed as

LivestockUnsupervised Machine LearningAnimalsCattleFemaleMathematicsNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of Resultsdairy welfareEuclidean distance matrix analysisfacial expressionfacial morphologyprecision livestock farmingprojective biometricsscale free morphometricsunsupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID36366045
PMCPMC9653925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.