Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36366011›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Addressing the Challenges and Barriers to the Integration of Machine Learning into Clinical Practice: An Innovative Method to Hybrid Human-Machine Intelligence.

Chadia Ed-Driouch, Franck Mars, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Cédric Dumas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03652402 (The EUropean TRAnsplantation and INnovation Consortium for Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplant Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03652402 completednot on this map

The EUropean TRAnsplantation and INnovation Consortium for Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplant Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2018 to 2021Enrolled558ConditionsKidney Transplant Rejection, Kidney Transplantation, Risk Stratification, PrognosisArmskidney transplantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chadia Ed-DriouchÉcole Centrale Nantes, IMT Atlantique, Nantes Université, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Franck MarsCentrale Nantes, Nantes Université, CNRS, LS2N, UMR 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4140-0049
Pierre-Antoine GourraudClinique des Données, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, CIC 1413, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Cédric DumasDépartement Automatique, Productique et Informatique, IMT Atlantique, CNRS, LS2N, UMR CNRS 6004, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-0988
École Centrale de Nantes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-RHUS-0010Bourse Région Pays de la Loire 2019_11235Research and Innovation Programme 754995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models have proven their potential in acquiring and analyzing large amounts of data to help solve real-world, complex problems. Their use in healthcare is expected to help physicians make diagnoses, prognoses, treatment decisions, and disease outcome predictions. However, ML solutions are not currently deployed in most healthcare systems. One of the main reasons for this is the provenance, transparency, and clinical utility of the training data. Physicians reject ML solutions if they are not at least based on accurate data and do not clearly include the decision-making process used in clinical practice. In this paper, we present a hybrid human-machine intelligence method to create predictive models driven by clinical practice. We promote the use of quality-approved data and the inclusion of physician reasoning in the ML process. Instead of training the ML algorithms on the given data to create predictive models (conventional method), we propose to pre-categorize the data according to the expert physicians' knowledge and experience. Comparing the results of the conventional method of ML learning versus the hybrid physician-algorithm method showed that the models based on the latter can perform better. Physicians' engagement is the most promising condition for the safe and innovative use of ML in healthcare.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPhysiciansAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDelivery of Health CareHumansclinical decision-makinghuman–machine collaborationmachine learningmultiple sclerosispersonalized medicinephysician–algorithm collaboration

Identifiers

PMID36366011
PMCPMC9653746
OpenAlexW4307944976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.