ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Addressing the Challenges and Barriers to the Integration of Machine Learning into Clinical Practice: An Innovative Method to Hybrid Human-Machine Intelligence.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03652402 (The EUropean TRAnsplantation and INnovation Consortium for Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplant Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The EUropean TRAnsplantation and INnovation Consortium for Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplant Patients
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of the treatment response and local failure of patients with brain metastasis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Strokecopilot: a literature-based clinical decision support system for acute ischemic stroke treatment.Journal of neurology · 2023Pooled it
- Mental health monitoring in 5G Edge-Enabled Cognitive IoT with Temporal Shift Transformer and integrated Stackelberg Game Theory and Nomadic People Optimizer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Alchemist, the Scientist, and the Robot: Exploring the Potential of Human-AI Symbiosis in Self-Driving Polymer Laboratories.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence with Gamma Knife radiosurgery in treating meningiomas and schwannomas: a review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Review
- Advances in the application of human-machine collaboration in healthcare: insights from China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- A machine learning-based predictive nomogram for early neurological improvement after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based IoT System for Remote Monitoring and Early Detection of Health Issues in Real-Time.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models have proven their potential in acquiring and analyzing large amounts of data to help solve real-world, complex problems. Their use in healthcare is expected to help physicians make diagnoses, prognoses, treatment decisions, and disease outcome predictions. However, ML solutions are not currently deployed in most healthcare systems. One of the main reasons for this is the provenance, transparency, and clinical utility of the training data. Physicians reject ML solutions if they are not at least based on accurate data and do not clearly include the decision-making process used in clinical practice. In this paper, we present a hybrid human-machine intelligence method to create predictive models driven by clinical practice. We promote the use of quality-approved data and the inclusion of physician reasoning in the ML process. Instead of training the ML algorithms on the given data to create predictive models (conventional method), we propose to pre-categorize the data according to the expert physicians' knowledge and experience. Comparing the results of the conventional method of ML learning versus the hybrid physician-algorithm method showed that the models based on the latter can perform better. Physicians' engagement is the most promising condition for the safe and innovative use of ML in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.