Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365977›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Multi-Strategy Learning Boosted Colony Predation Algorithm for Photovoltaic Model Parameter Identification.

Mingjing Wang, Long Chen, Huiling Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingjing WangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Long ChenSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China.
Huiling ChenCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-9693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling solar systems necessitates the effective identification of unknown and variable photovoltaic parameters. To efficiently convert solar energy into electricity, these parameters must be precise. The research introduces the multi-strategy learning boosted colony predation algorithm (MLCPA) for optimizing photovoltaic parameters and boosting the efficiency of solar power conversion. In MLCPA, opposition-based learning can be used to investigate each individual's opposing position, thereby accelerating convergence and preserving population diversity. Level-based learning categorizes individuals according to their fitness levels and treats them differently, allowing for a more optimal balance between variation and intensity during optimization. On a variety of benchmark functions, the MLCPA's performance is compared to the performance of the best algorithms currently in use. On a variety of benchmark functions, the MLCPA's performance is compared to that of existing methods. MLCPA is then used to estimate the parameters of the single, double, and photovoltaic modules. Last but not least, the stability of the proposed MLCPA algorithm is evaluated on the datasheets of many manufacturers at varying temperatures and irradiance levels. Statistics have demonstrated that the MLCPA is more precise and dependable in predicting photovoltaic mode critical parameters, making it a viable tool for solar system parameter identification issues.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorSolar EnergyAlgorithmsAnimalsElectricityHumansLearningcolony predation algorithmlevel-based learningmulti-strategy learningparameter extractionphotovoltaic models

Identifiers

PMID36365977
PMCPMC9658493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.