Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365966›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Erroneous Vehicle Velocity Estimation Correction Using Anisotropic Magnetoresistive (AMR) Sensors.

Donatas Miklusis, Vytautas Markevicius, Dangirutis Navikas, Mantas Ambraziunas, Mindaugas Cepenas, Algimantas Valinevicius, Mindaugas Zilys, Krzysztof Okarma, Inigo Cuinas, Darius Andriukaitis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Donatas MiklusisDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vytautas MarkeviciusDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dangirutis NavikasDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mantas AmbraziunasDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mindaugas CepenasDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Algimantas ValineviciusDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mindaugas ZilysDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Krzysztof OkarmaDepartment of Signal Processing and Multimedia Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, 70313 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6721-3241
Inigo CuinasCommunications-atlanTTic Research Center, Department of Signal Theory, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-1947
Darius AndriukaitisDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Studentu St. 50-438, 51368 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-8917

Funding

Lietuvos Mokslo Taryba S-MIP-21-34
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic field sensors installed in the road infrastructure can be used for autonomous traffic flow parametrization. Although the main goal of such a measuring system is the recognition of the class of vehicle and classification, velocity is the essential parameter for further calculation and it must be estimated with high reliability. In-field test campaigns, during actual traffic conditions, showed that commonly accepted velocity estimation methods occasionally produce highly erroneous results. For anomaly detection, we propose a criterion and two different correction algorithms. Non-linear signal rescaling and time-based segmentation algorithms are presented and compared for faulty result mitigation. The first one consists of suppressing the highly distorted signal peaks and looking for the best match with cross-correlation. The second approach relies on signals segmentation according to the feature points and multiple cross-correlation comparisons. The proposed two algorithms are evaluated with a dataset of over 300 magnetic signatures of a vehicle from unconstraint traffic conditions. Results show that the proposed criteria highlight all greatly faulty results and that the correction algorithms reduce the maximum error by twofold, but due to the increased mean error, mitigation technics shall be used explicitly with distorted signals.

Indexed as

AMRcross-correlationmagnetic field sensorstraffic intelligent transportation system

Identifiers

PMID36365966
PMCPMC9654797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.