Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365921›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Modeling and Applying Implicit Dormant Features for Recommendation via Clustering and Deep Factorization.

Alpamis Kutlimuratov, Akmalbek Bobomirzaevich Abdusalomov, Rashid Oteniyazov, Sanjar Mirzakhalilov, Taeg Keun Whangbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alpamis KutlimuratovDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 461-701, Korea.
Akmalbek Bobomirzaevich AbdusalomovDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 461-701, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5923-8695
Rashid OteniyazovDepartment of Telecommunication Engineering, Nukus Branch of Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named after Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi, Nukus 230100, Uzbekistan.
Sanjar MirzakhalilovDepartment of Information-Computer Technologies and Programming, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named after Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent 100200, Uzbekistan.
Taeg Keun WhangboDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 461-701, Korea.

Funding

Gachon University GCU-2019-0796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E-commerce systems experience poor quality of performance when the number of records in the customer database increases due to the gradual growth of customers and products. Applying implicit hidden features into the recommender system (RS) plays an important role in enhancing its performance due to the original dataset's sparseness. In particular, we can comprehend the relationship between products and customers by analyzing the hierarchically expressed hidden implicit features of them. Furthermore, the effectiveness of rating prediction and system customization increases when the customer-added tag information is combined with hierarchically structured hidden implicit features. For these reasons, we concentrate on early grouping of comparable customers using the clustering technique as a first step, and then, we further enhance the efficacy of recommendations by obtaining implicit hidden features and combining them via customer's tag information, which regularizes the deep-factorization procedure. The idea behind the proposed method was to cluster customers early via a customer rating matrix and deeply factorize a basic WNMF (weighted nonnegative matrix factorization) model to generate customers preference's hierarchically structured hidden implicit features and product characteristics in each cluster, which reveals a deep relationship between them and regularizes the prediction procedure via an auxiliary parameter (tag information). The testimonies and empirical findings supported the viability of the proposed approach. Especially, MAE of the rating prediction was 0.8011 with 60% training dataset size, while the error rate was equal to 0.7965 with 80% training dataset size. Moreover, MAE rates were 0.8781 and 0.9046 in new 50 and 100 customer cold-start scenarios, respectively. The proposed model outperformed other baseline models that independently employed the major properties of customers, products, or tags in the prediction process.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCommerceCluster AnalysisDatabases, Factualclustering-based recommendation systemdeep factorizationheterogeneous informationimplicit featuresrecommendation systemtag informationweighted nonnegative matrix factorization

Identifiers

PMID36365921
PMCPMC9654534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.