ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Deep Learning Hybrid Techniques for Brain Tumor Segmentation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for MRI Brain Tumor Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Improved lung nodule segmentation with a squeeze excitation dilated attention based residual UNet.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Segmentation of Low-Grade Brain Tumors Using Mutual Attention Multimodal MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evolution of Molecular Biomarkers and Precision Molecular Therapeutic Strategies in Glioblastoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Enhancing brain tumor segmentation in MRI images using the IC-net algorithm framework.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- GPU-Based Parallel Processing Techniques for Enhanced Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis: A Review of Recent Advances.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Compare three deep learning-based artificial intelligence models for classification of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter diagnostic study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- A novel approach to brain tumor detection using K-Means++, SGLDM, ResNet50, and synthetic data augmentation.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Dual Deep CNN for Tumor Brain Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An Adaptive Kernels Layer for Deep Neural Networks Based on Spectral Analysis for Image Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical images play an important role in medical diagnosis and treatment. Oncologists analyze images to determine the different characteristics of deadly diseases, plan the therapy, and observe the evolution of the disease. The objective of this paper is to propose a method for the detection of brain tumors. Brain tumors are identified from Magnetic Resonance (MR) images by performing suitable segmentation procedures. The latest technical literature concerning radiographic images of the brain shows that deep learning methods can be implemented to extract specific features of brain tumors, aiding clinical diagnosis. For this reason, most data scientists and AI researchers work on Machine Learning methods for designing automatic screening procedures. Indeed, an automated method would result in quicker segmentation findings, providing a robust output with respect to possible differences in data sources, mostly due to different procedures in data recording and storing, resulting in a more consistent identification of brain tumors. To improve the performance of the segmentation procedure, new architectures are proposed and tested in this paper. We propose deep neural networks for the detection of brain tumors, trained on the MRI scans of patients' brains. The proposed architectures are based on convolutional neural networks and inception modules for brain tumor segmentation. A comparison of these proposed architectures with the baseline reference ones shows very interesting results. MI-Unet showed a performance increase in comparison to baseline Unet architecture by 7.5% in dice score, 23.91% insensitivity, and 7.09% in specificity. Depth-wise separable MI-Unet showed a performance increase by 10.83% in dice score, 2.97% in sensitivity, and 12.72% in specificity as compared to the baseline Unet architecture. Hybrid Unet architecture achieved performance improvement of 9.71% in dice score, 3.56% in sensitivity, and 12.6% in specificity. Whereas the depth-wise separable hybrid Unet architecture outperformed the baseline architecture by 15.45% in dice score, 20.56% in sensitivity, and 12.22% in specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.