Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365896›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Graph Theoretical Analysis of EEG Functional Connectivity Patterns and Fusion with Physiological Signals for Emotion Recognition.

Vasileios-Rafail Xefteris, Athina Tsanousa, Nefeli Georgakopoulou, Sotiris Diplaris, Stefanos Vrochidis, Ioannis Kompatsiaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vasileios-Rafail XefterisCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-8412
Athina TsanousaCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-4446
Nefeli GeorgakopoulouCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0729-8992
Sotiris DiplarisCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stefanos VrochidisCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2505-9178
Ioannis KompatsiarisCentre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th Km Charilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6447-9020

Funding

European Commission 825079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition is a key attribute for realizing advances in human-computer interaction, especially when using non-intrusive physiological sensors, such as electroencephalograph (EEG) and electrocardiograph. Although functional connectivity of EEG has been utilized for emotion recognition, the graph theory analysis of EEG connectivity patterns has not been adequately explored. The exploitation of brain network characteristics could provide valuable information regarding emotions, while the combination of EEG and peripheral physiological signals can reveal correlation patterns of human internal state. In this work, a graph theoretical analysis of EEG functional connectivity patterns along with fusion between EEG and peripheral physiological signals for emotion recognition has been proposed. After extracting functional connectivity from EEG signals, both global and local graph theory features are extracted. Those features are concatenated with statistical features from peripheral physiological signals and fed to different classifiers and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for emotion recognition. The average accuracy on the DEAP dataset using CNN was 55.62% and 57.38% for subject-independent valence and arousal classification, respectively, and 83.94% and 83.87% for subject-dependent classification. Those scores went up to 75.44% and 78.77% for subject-independent classification and 88.27% and 90.84% for subject-dependent classification using a feature selection algorithm, exceeding the current state-of-the-art results.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArousalEmotionsHumansEEGemotion recognitionfunctional connectivitygraph theorymultimodal fusionmultimodal physiological signals

Identifiers

PMID36365896
PMCPMC9656224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.