ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predicting Chemical Carcinogens Using a Hybrid Neural Network Deep Learning Method.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- LMF-CP: An Interpretable Multimodal Late-Fusion Framework for Compound Carcinogenicity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Prediction, lag and mixture effects of meteorology and pollutants on the incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis in Jining City, China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning-Based Approaches for Genetic Damage Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Computational toxicology in drug discovery: applications of artificial intelligence in ADMET and toxicity prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Impact of halogenation on scaffold toxicity assessed using HD-GEM machine learning model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Unlocking the potential of AI: Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemicals.Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025Review
- Article
- Advancing Drug Safety in Drug Development: Bridging Computational Predictions for Enhanced Toxicity Prediction.Chemical research in toxicology · 2024Review
- Classification of substances by health hazard using deep neural networks and molecular electron densities.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- AI and ML-based risk assessment of chemicals: predicting carcinogenic risk from chemical-induced genomic instability.Frontiers in toxicology · 2024Review
- Construction of an Early Alert System for Intradialytic Hypotension before Initiating Hemodialysis Based on Machine Learning.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Artificial Neural Networks for IoT-Enabled Smart Applications: Recent Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Predicting Dose-Range Chemical Toxicity using Novel Hybrid Deep Machine-Learning Method.Toxics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Determining environmental chemical carcinogenicity is urgently needed as humans are increasingly exposed to these chemicals. In this study, we developed a hybrid neural network (HNN) method called HNN-Cancer to predict potential carcinogens of real-life chemicals. The HNN-Cancer included a new SMILES feature representation method by modifying our previous 3D array representation of 1D SMILES simulated by the convolutional neural network (CNN). We developed binary classification, multiclass classification, and regression models based on diverse non-congeneric chemicals. Along with the HNN-Cancer model, we developed models based on the random forest (RF), bootstrap aggregating (Bagging), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) methods for binary and multiclass classification. We developed regression models using HNN-Cancer, RF, support vector regressor (SVR), gradient boosting (GB), kernel ridge (KR), decision tree with AdaBoost (DT), KNeighbors (KN), and a consensus method. The performance of the models for all classifications was assessed using various statistical metrics. The accuracy of the HNN-Cancer, RF, and Bagging models were 74%, and their AUC was ~0.81 for binary classification models developed with 7994 chemicals. The sensitivity was 79.5% and the specificity was 67.3% for the HNN-Cancer, which outperforms the other methods. In the case of multiclass classification models with 1618 chemicals, we obtained the optimal accuracy of 70% with an AUC 0.7 for HNN-Cancer, RF, Bagging, and AdaBoost, respectively. In the case of regression models, the correlation coefficient (R) was around 0.62 for HNN-Cancer and RF higher than the SVM, GB, KR, DTBoost, and NN machine learning methods. Overall, the HNN-Cancer performed better for the majority of the known carcinogen experimental datasets. Further, the predictive performance of HNN-Cancer on diverse chemicals is comparable to the literature-reported models that included similar and less diverse molecules. Our HNN-Cancer could be used in identifying potentially carcinogenic chemicals for a wide variety of chemical classes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.