Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365852›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Validity and Reliability of a Novel Smartphone Tele-Assessment Solution for Quantifying Hip Range of Motion.

Charlotte J Marshall, Doa El-Ansary, Adrian Pranata, Charlotte Ganderton, John O'Donnell, Amir Takla, Phong Tran, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Oren Tirosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte J MarshallSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5259-892X
Doa El-AnsarySchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Adrian PranataSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Charlotte GandertonSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
John O'DonnellHip Arthroscopy Australia, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0486-778X
Amir TaklaHip Arthroscopy Australia, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia.
Phong TranSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Nilmini WickramasingheSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Oren TiroshSchool of Health Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-6399

Funding

Defence Health Foundation 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTele-health has become a major mode of delivery in patient care, with increasing interest in the use of tele-platforms for remote patient assessment. The use of smartphone technology to measure hip range of motion has been reported previously, with good to excellent validity and reliability. However, these smartphone applications did not provide real-time tele-assessment functionality. We developed a novel smartphone application, the TelePhysio app, which allows the clinician to remotely connect to the patient's device and measure their hip range of motion in real time. The aim of this study was to investigate the concurrent validity and between-sessions reliability of the TelePhysio app. In addition, the study investigated the concurrent validity, between-sessions, and inter-rater reliability of a second tele-assessment approach using video analysis.

methodsFifteen participants (nfemales = 6) were assessed in our laboratory (session 1) and at their home (session 2). We assessed maximum voluntary active hip flexion in supine and hip internal and external rotation, in both prone and sitting positions. TelePhysio and video analysis were validated against the laboratory's 3-dimensional motion capture system in session 1, and evaluated for between-sessions reliability in session 2. Video analysis inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing the analysis of two raters in session 2.

resultsThe TelePhysio app demonstrated high concurrent validity against the 3D motion capture system (ICCs 0.63-0.83) for all hip movements in all positions, with the exception of hip internal rotation in prone (ICC = 0.48,

conclusionsBoth tele-assessment approaches, using either a smartphone application or video analysis, demonstrate good to excellent concurrent validity, and moderate to substantial between-sessions reliability in measuring hip rotation and flexion range of motion, but less in internal hip rotation in the prone position. Thus, it is recommended that the seated position be used when assessing hip internal rotation. The use of a smartphone to remotely assess hip range of motion is an appropriate, effective, and low-cost alternative to the face-to-face assessments. This method provides a simple, cost effective, and accessible patient assessment tool with no additional cost. This study validates the use of smartphone technology as a tele-assessment tool for remote hip range of motion assessment.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsSmartphoneHumansMovementRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of Resultship range of motionsmartphonetele-assessment

Identifiers

PMID36365852
PMCPMC9657721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.