Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365811›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Use of Audio Signals for Detecting COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

José Gómez Aleixandre, Mohamed Elgendi, Carlo Menon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José Gómez AleixandreBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-2358
Mohamed ElgendiBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1831-0202
Carlo MenonBiomedical and Mobile Health Technology Lab, ETH Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-9977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic review on the topic of automatic detection of COVID-19 using audio signals was performed. A total of 48 papers were obtained after screening 659 records identified in the PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. The reviewed studies employ a mixture of open-access and self-collected datasets. Because COVID-19 has only recently been investigated, there is a limited amount of available data. Most of the data are crowdsourced, which motivated a detailed study of the various pre-processing techniques used by the reviewed studies. Although 13 of the 48 identified papers show promising results, several have been performed with small-scale datasets (<200). Among those papers, convolutional neural networks and support vector machine algorithms were the best-performing methods. The analysis of the extracted features showed that Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and zero-crossing rate continue to be the most popular choices. Less common alternatives, such as non-linear features, have also been proven to be effective. The reported values for sensitivity range from 65.0% to 99.8% and those for accuracy from 59.0% to 99.8%.

Indexed as

COVID-19AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machineaffordable healthcareaudio-based health assessmentautomatic COVID-19 diagnosiscontactless health monitoringdigital healthremote health monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36365811
PMCPMC9653621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.