ArticlePolymers2022
Influence of Mixing Order on the Synthesis of Geopolymer Concrete.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Assessment of High-Temperature Performance, Economic and Sustainability of MSWI Bottom Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Slag Paste.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of coir and flax fiber lengths on fracture toughness of fly ash, slag, and silica fume-based geopolymer concrete.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of moringa seed powder-modified slag geopolymers for enhanced mechanical properties and effective dye removal.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Upscaling of Copper Slag-Based Geopolymer to 3D Printing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- A Review on Fresh, Hardened, and Microstructural Properties of Fibre-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete.Polymers · 2023Review
- Effect of Salinity and Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer on Fresh Property of Seawater-Blended Cement.Polymers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Geopolymers are high-performance, cost-effective materials made from industrial waste that ideally fit the needs of 3D printing technology used in construction. The novelty of the present work lies in the investigation of methods to mix geopolymer concrete from fly ash (FA) class F, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), and raw calcined kaolin clay (RCKC) to determine the mixing procedure which provides the best mechanical strength and structural integrity. The experimental results show that aluminosilicates with different reaction parameters when mixed one after another provide the optimal results while the geopolymer concrete possesses the highest compressive strength and the denser structure. The results demonstrated that the reactivity of GGBS, FA, and RCKC increased for different depolymerization speeds of the selected aluminosilicates. This research will provide results on how to improve the mixing order for geopolymer synthesis for 3D printing demands. The highest compressive strength and denser structure of geopolymer concrete is achieved when each type of aluminosilicate is mixed with an alkaline medium separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.