Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365761›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Enhanced Soft Sensor with Qualified Augmented Samples for Quality Prediction of the Polyethylene Process.

Yun Dai, Angpeng Liu, Meng Chen, Yi Liu, Yuan Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yun DaiInstitute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Angpeng LiuInstitute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Meng ChenGuangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Yi LiuInstitute of Process Equipment and Control Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4066-689X
Yuan YaoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 30013, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0025-6175

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 111-2221-E-007-005.National Natural Science Foundation of China 61873241National Natural Science Foundation of China 62022073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-driven soft sensors have increasingly been applied for the quality measurement of industrial polymerization processes in recent years. However, owing to the costly assay process, the limited labeled data available still pose significant obstacles to the construction of accurate models. In this study, a novel soft sensor named the selective Wasserstein generative adversarial network, with gradient penalty-based support vector regression (SWGAN-SVR), is proposed to enhance quality prediction with limited training samples. Specifically, the Wasserstein generative adversarial network with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP) is employed to capture the distribution of the available limited labeled data and to generate virtual candidates. Subsequently, an effective data-selection strategy is developed to alleviate the problem of varied-quality samples caused by the unstable training of the WGAN-GP. The selection strategy includes two parts: the centroid metric criterion and the statistical characteristic criterion. An SVR model is constructed based on the qualified augmented training data to evaluate the prediction performance. The superiority of SWGAN-SVR is demonstrated, using a numerical example and an industrial polyethylene process.

Indexed as

data augmentationdata selectiongenerative adversarial networkpolymerization processsoft sensorsupport vector regression

Identifiers

PMID36365761
PMCPMC9656800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.