ReviewPolymers2022
Recent Advances in Multi-Material 3D Printing of Functional Ceramic Devices.
Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A concurrent bioceramic colloid design for dental crowns additive manufacturing by vat photopolymerization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Structured Polymer-Derived Ceramic Composites via Near-Infrared Thermal Stereolithography.ACS applied polymer materials · 2025Article
- 3D Printing of Porous Ceramics for Enhanced Thermal Insulation Properties.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Challenges and opportunities in engineering next-generation 3D microelectronic devices: improved performance and higher integration density.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
- Ceramics for Microelectromechanical Systems Applications: A Review.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Use of 3D printing to integrate microchip electrophoresis with amperometric detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Nozzle Innovations That Improve Capacity and Capabilities of Multimaterial Additive Manufacturing.ACS engineering Au · 2024Review
- Development of TiOMicromachines · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, functional ceramic devices have become smaller, thinner, more refined, and highly integrated, which makes it difficult to realize their rapid prototyping and low-cost manufacturing using traditional processing. As an emerging technology, multi-material 3D printing offers increased complexity and greater freedom in the design of functional ceramic devices because of its unique ability to directly construct arbitrary 3D parts that incorporate multiple material constituents without an intricate process or expensive tools. Here, the latest advances in multi-material 3D printing methods are reviewed, providing a comprehensive study on 3D-printable functional ceramic materials and processes for various functional ceramic devices, including capacitors, multilayer substrates, and microstrip antennas. Furthermore, the key challenges and prospects of multi-material 3D-printed functional ceramic devices are identified, and future directions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.