Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365609›Full record

ReviewPolymers2022

Clinical Applications of Polyetheretherketone in Removable Dental Prostheses: Accuracy, Characteristics, and Performance.

Yuchen Liu, Ming Fang, Ruifeng Zhao, Hengyan Liu, Kangjie Li, Min Tian, Lina Niu, Rui Xie, Shizhu Bai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Research progress on enhancing osseointegration properties of polyetheretherketone implants through various modification methods].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuchen LiuState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3178-9756
Ming FangState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5737-3962
Ruifeng ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Hengyan LiuState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Kangjie LiState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Min TianState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9147-2895
Lina NiuState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Rui XieState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.
Shizhu BaiState Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2439-3211
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970987Shaanxi Key Research and Development Program 2022SF-062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-performance thermoplastic polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has excellent mechanical properties, biocompatibility, chemical stability, and radiolucency. The present article comprehensively reviews various applications of PEEK in removable dental prostheses, including in removable partial dentures (RPDs) (frameworks and clasps), double-crown RPDs, and obturators. The clinical performance of PEEK in removable dental prostheses is shown to be satisfactory and promising based on the short-term clinical evidence and technical complications are scarce. Moreover, the accuracy of RPDs is a vital factor for their long-term success rate. PEEK in removable dental prostheses is fabricated using the conventional lost-wax technique and CAD/CAM milling, which produces a good fit. Furthermore, fused deposition modeling is considered to be one of the most practical additive techniques. PEEK in removable prostheses produced by this technique exhibits good results in terms of the framework fit. However, in light of the paucity of evidence regarding other additive techniques, these manufacturers cannot yet be endorsed. Surface roughness, bacterial retention, color stability, and wear resistance should also be considered when attempting to increase the survival rates of PEEK removable prostheses. In addition, pastes represent an effective method for PEEK polishing to obtain a reduced surface roughness, which facilitates lower bacterial retention. As compared to other composite materials, PEEK is less likely to become discolored or deteriorate due to wear abrasion.

Indexed as

accuracyclinical performancepolyetheretherketoneremovable prostheses

Identifiers

PMID36365609
PMCPMC9654455
OpenAlexW4307989451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.