Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365391›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Dry Matter Yield Stability Analysis of Maize Genotypes Grown in Al Toxic and Optimum Controlled Environments.

Rutendo M Zishiri, Charles S Mutengwa, Aleck Kondwakwenda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rutendo M ZishiriDepartment of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Charles S MutengwaDepartment of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.
Aleck KondwakwendaDepartment of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-6786-3175

Funding

National Research Foundation CSRU 180504326029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breeding for Al tolerance is the most sustainable strategy to reduce yield losses caused by Al toxicity in plants. The use of rapid, cheap and reliable testing methods and environments enables breeders to make quick selection decisions. The objectives of this study were to (i) identify high dry matter yielding and stable quality protein maize (QPM) lines grown under Al toxic and optimum conditions and (ii) compare the discriminating power of laboratory- and greenhouse-based testing environments. A total of 75 tropical QPM inbred lines were tested at seedling stage for dry matter yield and stability under optimum and Al toxic growing conditions across six laboratory- and greenhouse-based environments. The nutrient solution method was used for the laboratory trials, while the soil bioassay method was used for the greenhouse trials. A yield loss of 55% due to Al toxicity was observed, confirming the adverse effects of Al toxicity on maize productivity. The ANOVA revealed the presence of genetic variation among the set of genotypes used in this study, which can be exploited through plant breeding. Seventeen stable and high-yielding lines were identified and recommended. Greenhouse-based environments were more discriminating than laboratory environments. Therefore, we concluded that greenhouse environments are more informative than laboratory environments when testing genotypes for Al tolerance.

Indexed as

AMMIdiscriminating abilityGGE biplotinbred linesplant breedingseedlings

Identifiers

PMID36365391
PMCPMC9658909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.