Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365335›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

How Do Plants Respond to Combined Drought and Salinity Stress?-A Systematic Review.

Prodipto Bishnu Angon, Md Tahjib-Ul-Arif, Samia Islam Samin, Ummya Habiba, M Afzal Hossain, Marian Brestic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
25.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Transcriptomic, biochemical, and microbiome assessments into drought and salinity tolerance in durum wheat mediated by plant growth-promoting bacteria.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Differential Impact of SiOPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Prodipto Bishnu AngonFaculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-6381-8844
Md Tahjib-Ul-ArifDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-0197-2990
Samia Islam SaminFaculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
Ummya HabibaFaculty of Agriculture, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
M Afzal HossainDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.
Marian BresticInstitut of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3470-6100
Bangladesh Agricultural University · BDSlovak University of Agriculture in Nitra · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are frequently exposed to one or more abiotic stresses, including combined salinity-drought, which significantly lowers plant growth. Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the responses of plants to combined salinity and drought stress. However, a meta-analysis-based systematic review has not been conducted yet. Therefore, this study analyzed how plants respond differently to combined salinity-drought stress compared to either stress alone. We initially retrieved 536 publications from databases and selected 30 research articles following a rigorous screening. Data on plant growth-related, physiological, and biochemical parameters were collected from these selected articles and analyzed. Overall, the combined salinity-drought stress has a greater negative impact on plant growth, photosynthesis, ionic balance, and oxidative balance than either stress alone. In some cases, salinity had a greater impact than drought stress and vice versa. Drought stress inhibited photosynthesis more than salinity, whereas salinity caused ionic imbalance more than drought stress. Single salinity and drought reduced shoot biomass equally, but salinity reduced root biomass more than drought. Plants experienced more oxidative stress under combined stress conditions because antioxidant levels did not increase in response to combined salinity-drought stress compared to individual salinity or drought stress. This study provided a comparative understanding of plants' responses to individual and combined salinity and drought stress, and identified several research gaps. More comprehensive genetic and physiological studies are needed to understand the intricate interplay between salinity and drought in plants.

Indexed as

abiotic stressantioxidantscombined stressionic homeostasisosmotic stressphotosynthesisplant growthsalt stress

Identifiers

PMID36365335
PMCPMC9655390
OpenAlexW4307940480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.