Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36365015›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

New

Marta Prygiel, Maciej Polak, Ewa Mosiej, Karol Wdowiak, Kamila Formińska, Aleksandra Anna Zasada

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Up-to-date MALDI-TOF MS-based identification of theJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. First isolation of nontoxigenic tox gene-bearing Corynebacterium ulcerans from a diphtheria case in Minas Gerais, Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. IDCases · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta PrygielDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-0767
Maciej PolakDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa MosiejDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Karol WdowiakDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Kamila FormińskaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra Anna ZasadaDepartment of Sera and Vaccines Evaluation, National Institute of Public Health NIH, National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-0941
Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznego PZH – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy · PL

Funding

National Institute of Public Health NIH-National Research Institute BS-2/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only three

Indexed as

C. belfantiiC. diphtheriaeCorynebacteriumC. rouxiiC. silvaticumC. ulceransdiphtheria toxinNTTBtox gene

Identifiers

PMID36365015
PMCPMC9693595
OpenAlexW4307764993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.