Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36364999›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Acceptance towards Monkeypox Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Juan R Ulloque-Badaracco, Esteban A Alarcón-Braga, Enrique A Hernandez-Bustamante, Ali Al-Kassab-Córdova, Vicente A Benites-Zapata, D Katterine Bonilla-Aldana, Alfonso J Rodriguez-Morales

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk perception and mpox vaccine acceptability among people living with HIV in northern Nigeria.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan R Ulloque-BadaraccoEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-1093-4937
Esteban A Alarcón-BragaEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru.
Enrique A Hernandez-BustamanteSociedad Cientifica de Estudiantes de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo, Trujillo 13011, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-1974-5200
Ali Al-Kassab-CórdovaCentro de Excelencia en Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15012, Peru.ORCID 0000-0003-3718-5857
Vicente A Benites-ZapataEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru.
D Katterine Bonilla-AldanaResearch Unit, Universidad Continental, Huancayo 12000, Peru.
Alfonso J Rodriguez-MoralesGrupo de Investigación Biomedicina, Faculty of Medicine, Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma de las Americas, Pereira 660003, Risaralda, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9773-2192
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences · PEUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PEUniversidad Científica del Sur · PEUniversidad Continental · PE

Funding

Peruvian University of Applied Sciences A-023-2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination it is considered a vital strategy in order to mitigate monkeypox by protecting from severe disease and helping in reduction of hospitalisations. In this sense, this study aims to estimate the global prevalence of vaccination acceptance against monkeypox. We conducted a systematic review with a comprehensive search strategy for the following databases: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. A random-effect model meta-analysis was carried out using observational studies assessing the intention of vaccines against monkeypox from multiple continents. The quality assessment was developed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies. In addition, a subgroup analysis by study location and population and a sensitivity analysis was developed.Eleven cross-sectional studies were included. A total of 8045 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of monkeypox vaccination acceptance in all participants was 56.0% (95%CI: 42.0-70.0%). In the subgroup analysis of monkeypox vaccine acceptance according to continents, the prevalence of vaccine acceptance was 50.0% (95%CI: 24.0-76.0%) in Asian countries and 70.0% (95%CI: 55.0-84.0%) in European countries. The prevalence of vaccine acceptance was 43.0% (95%CI: 35.0-50.0%) in the general population, 63.0% (95%CI: 42.0-70.0%) in healthcare workers, and 84.0% (95%CI: 83.0-86.0%) in the LGBTI community. Despite the high prevalence of monkeypox vaccination acceptance in the LGBTI community found in our study, vaccination acceptance from healthcare workers and the general population are lower. Governments could use these results for planning, developing or promoting vaccination strategies and public health policies focused on these populations.

Indexed as

monkeypoxpublic healthsystematic reviewvaccination acceptance

Identifiers

PMID36364999
PMCPMC9697127
OpenAlexW4307941307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.