Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36364912›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

What Advice Is Currently Given to Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) by Eyecare Practitioners, and How Effective Is It at Bringing about a Change in Lifestyle? A Systematic Review.

Sonali Dave, Alison Binns, Valldeflors Vinuela-Navarro, Tamsin Callaghan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonali DaveDepartment of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-3991
Alison BinnsDepartment of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8621-498X
Valldeflors Vinuela-NavarroDepartment of Optics and Optometry, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Carrer Violinista Vellsolà, 37, 08222 Terrassa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-5906
Tamsin CallaghanDepartment of Optometry and Visual Sciences, School of Health and Psychological Sciences, University of London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9258-8504
University of London · GBUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no treatment for early/intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) but Eye Care Professionals (ECPs) are recommended to advise patients about modifiable lifestyle factors, including dietary changes, that can slow disease progression. The aim of this review was to understand advice currently given to patients with AMD by ECPs and to evaluate evidence regarding patient compliance. A systematic review was conducted of literature published in electronic databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PyscARTICLES, EMBASE, AMED. Methods followed PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020223724). Twenty-four reports were eligible for inclusion, 12 focused on ECP experience, 7 on patient experience, and 6 on impact of advice (one paper reported on the ECP and patient experience). Studies reported that a substantial proportion of patients did not recall receiving lifestyle modification advice from their ECP (57.95%, range 2-95% across patient based studies). Practitioners were most likely to provide advice about nutritional supplements (80%, range 67-93% across ECP studies), and least likely about smoking (44%, range 28-71% across ECP studies), however supplements advised did not always comply with evidence-based guidelines. The main reason for patients not following lifestyle advice was lack of provision by the ECP (54.5%, range 21-94% across studies on the impact of advice). The review highlighted a need for more studies to understand patient preferences for receiving advice and research on ECP perceived barriers to advice provision.

Indexed as

Macular DegenerationBehavior TherapyDietary SupplementsHumansLife StyleSmokingadviceage-related macular degenerationcommunicationlifestylenutrition

Identifiers

PMID36364912
PMCPMC9658969
OpenAlexW4308331258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.