ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Photocatalytic Water Splitting: How Far Away Are We from Being Able to Industrially Produce Solar Hydrogen?
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light-Driven Carbon Nitride Panel Technologies for Emerging Photocatalytic Applications.JACS Au · 2026Review
- TiOACS omega · 2025Article
- Advanced TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Constructing InMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Solar water splitting (SWS) has been researched for about five decades, but despite successes there has not been a big breakthrough advancement. While the three fundamental steps, light absorption, charge carrier separation and diffusion, and charge utilization at redox sites are given a great deal of attention either separately or simultaneously, practical considerations that can help to increase efficiency are rarely discussed or put into practice. Nevertheless, it is possible to increase the generation of solar hydrogen by making a few little but important adjustments. In this review, we talk about various methods for photocatalytic water splitting that have been documented in the literature and importance of the thin film approach to move closer to the large-scale photocatalytic hydrogen production. For instance, when comparing the film form of the identical catalyst to the particulate form, it was found that the solar hydrogen production increased by up to two orders of magnitude. The major topic of this review with thin-film forms is, discussion on several methods of increased hydrogen generation under direct solar and one-sun circumstances. The advantages and disadvantages of thin film and particle technologies are extensively discussed. In the current assessment, potential approaches and scalable success factors are also covered. As demonstrated by a film-based approach, the local charge utilization at a zero applied potential is an appealing characteristic for SWS. Furthermore, we compare the PEC-WS and SWS for solar hydrogen generation and discuss how far we are from producing solar hydrogen on an industrial scale. We believe that the currently employed variety of attempts may be condensed to fewer strategies such as film-based evaluation, which will create a path to address the SWS issue and achieve sustainable solar hydrogen generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.