Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363732›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Microbial Communities of Artisanal Fermented Milk Products from Russia.

Tatiana V Kochetkova, Ilya P Grabarnik, Alexandra A Klyukina, Kseniya S Zayulina, Ivan M Elizarov, Oksana O Shestakova, Liliya A Gavirova, Anastasia D Malysheva, Polina A Shcherbakova, Darima D Barkhutova and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modeling growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Genetic Characterisation of Closely RelatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tatiana V KochetkovaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-5960
Ilya P GrabarnikWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra A KlyukinaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5958-7350
Kseniya S ZayulinaWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.
Ivan M ElizarovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.
Oksana O ShestakovaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Liliya A GavirovaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia D MalyshevaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Polina A ShcherbakovaFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Darima D BarkhutovaInstitute of General and Experimental Biology Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 600047 Ulan-Ude, Russia.
Olga V KarnachukLaboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1318-2224
Andrey I ShestakovFaculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119234 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander G ElcheninovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.
Ilya V KublanovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Federal Research Center of Biotechnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation the framework of the Federal scientific-technical programme of the genetic technologies development for 2019-2027 (Agreement № 075-15-2021-1401, 03 November 2021)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fermented milk products (FMPs) have numerous health properties, making them an important part of our nutrient budget. Based on traditions, history and geography, there are different preferences and recipes for FMP preparation in distinct regions of the world and Russia in particular. A number of dairy products, both widely occurring and region-specific, were sampled in the households and local markets of the Caucasus republics, Buryatia, Altai, and the Far East and European regions of Russia. The examined FMPs were produced from cow, camel, mare’s or mixed milk, in the traditional way, without adding commercial starter cultures. Lactate and acetate were the major volatile fatty acids (VFA) of the studied FMPs, while succinate, formate, propionate and n-butyrate were present in lower concentrations. Bacterial communities analyzed by 16S rRNA gene V4 fragment amplicon sequencing showed that Firmicutes (Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lentilactobacillus and Leuconostoc) was the predominant phylum in all analyzed FMPs, followed by Proteobacteria (Acetobacter, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas and Citrobacter). Lactobacillus (mainly in beverages) or Lactococcus (mainly in creamy and solid products) were the most abundant community-forming genera in FMPs where raw milk was used and fermentation took place at (or below) room temperature. In turn, representatives of Streptococcus genus dominated the FMPs made from melted or pasteurized milk and fermented at elevated temperatures (such as ryazhenka, cottage cheese and matsoni-like products). It was revealed that the microbial diversity of koumiss, shubat, ryazhenka, matsoni-like products, chegen, sour cream and bryndza varied slightly within each type and correlated well with the same products from other regions and countries. On the other hand, the microbiomes of kefir, prostokvasha, ayran, cottage cheese and suluguni-like cheese were more variable and were shaped by the influence of particular factors linked with regional differences and traditions expressed in specificities in the production process. The microbial diversity of aarts, khurunga, khuruud, tan, ayran and suluguni-like cheese was studied here, to our knowledge, for the first time. The results of this study emphasize the overall similarity of the microbial communities of various FMPs on the one hand, and specificities of regional products on the other. The latter are of particular value in the age of globalization when people have begun searching for new and unusual products and properties. Speaking more specifically, these novel products, with their characteristic communities, might be used for the development of novel microbial associations (i.e., starters) to produce novel products with improved or unique properties.

Indexed as

fermented beveragesfermented milk productslactic acid bacteriamicrobial communityNGStraditional dairy products

Identifiers

PMID36363732
PMCPMC9697859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.