Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363726›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Walid Ghazi Al Hakeem, Shahna Fathima, Revathi Shanmugasundaram, Ramesh K Selvaraj

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NPoultry science · 2026
    Review
  2. Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Journal of veterinary research · 2026
    Article
  7. Identification of the Phenicol Efflux GeneInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Functional Characterization of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preharvest Control ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Walid Ghazi Al HakeemDepartment of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Shahna FathimaDepartment of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1263-0870
Revathi ShanmugasundaramToxicology and Mycotoxin Research Unit, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Ramesh K SelvarajDepartment of Poultry Science, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
University of Georgia · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

United States Department of Agriculture 6040-42000-045-00D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

broilersCampylobacter jejunifeed additives

Identifiers

PMID36363726
PMCPMC9697106
OpenAlexW4307944290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.