Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363718›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Bacteriophages as Biocontrol Agents in Livestock Food Production.

Logan Gildea, Joseph Atia Ayariga, Boakai K Robertson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Emerging Challenges inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. A Novel LyticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. FightingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  16. Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Phage-Based Biosanitation Strategies for Minimizing PersistentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Logan GildeaThe Microbiology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (C-STEM), Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36106, USA.
Joseph Atia AyarigaThe Hemp Program, Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (C-STEM), Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA.
Boakai K RobertsonThe Microbiology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (C-STEM), Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36106, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1646729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages have been regarded as biocontrol agents that can be used in the food industry. They can be used in various applications, such as pathogen detection and bio-preservation. Their potential to improve the quality of food and prevent foodborne illness is widespread. These bacterial viruses can also be utilized in the preservation of various other food products. The specificity and high sensitivity of bacteriophages when they lyse bacterial targets have been regarded as important factors that contribute to their great potential utility in the food industry. This review will provide an overview of their current and potential applications.

Indexed as

bacterial resistancebacteriophagesbiocontrolfood production

Identifiers

PMID36363718
PMCPMC9692620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.