ArticleMembranes2022
Can Hindered Transport Models for Rigid Spheres Predict the Rejection of Single Stranded DNA from Porous Membranes?
Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rate-Engineered Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence for Real-Time Microsecond Dynamics of Single Biomolecules.Nano letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, predictions from a theoretical model describing the rejection of a rigid spherical solute from porous membranes are compared to experimental results for a single stranded DNA (ssDNA) with 60 thymine nucleotides. Experiments were conducted with different pore size track-etched membranes at different transmembrane pressures and different NaCl concentrations. The model includes both hydrodynamic and electrostatic solute-pore wall interactions; predictions were made using different size parameters for the ssDNA (radius of gyration, hydrodynamic radius, and root mean square end-to-end distance). At low transmembrane pressures, experimental results are in good agreement with rejection predictions made using the hard sphere model for the ssDNA when the solute size is described using its root mean square end-to-end distance. When the ssDNA size is characterized using the radius of gyration or the hydrodynamic radius, the hard sphere model under-predicts rejection. Not surprisingly, the model overestimates ssDNA rejection at conditions where flow induced elongation of the DNA is expected. The results from this study are encouraging because they mean that a relatively simple hindered transport model can be used to estimate the rejection of a small DNA from porous membranes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.