Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363653›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Can Hindered Transport Models for Rigid Spheres Predict the Rejection of Single Stranded DNA from Porous Membranes?

Hossein Nouri Alavijeh, Ruth E Baltus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hossein Nouri AlavijehDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4259, USA.
Ruth E BaltusDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5705, USA.
Clarkson University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

National Science Foundation CBET 1604715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, predictions from a theoretical model describing the rejection of a rigid spherical solute from porous membranes are compared to experimental results for a single stranded DNA (ssDNA) with 60 thymine nucleotides. Experiments were conducted with different pore size track-etched membranes at different transmembrane pressures and different NaCl concentrations. The model includes both hydrodynamic and electrostatic solute-pore wall interactions; predictions were made using different size parameters for the ssDNA (radius of gyration, hydrodynamic radius, and root mean square end-to-end distance). At low transmembrane pressures, experimental results are in good agreement with rejection predictions made using the hard sphere model for the ssDNA when the solute size is described using its root mean square end-to-end distance. When the ssDNA size is characterized using the radius of gyration or the hydrodynamic radius, the hard sphere model under-predicts rejection. Not surprisingly, the model overestimates ssDNA rejection at conditions where flow induced elongation of the DNA is expected. The results from this study are encouraging because they mean that a relatively simple hindered transport model can be used to estimate the rejection of a small DNA from porous membranes.

Indexed as

DNA filtrationhindered transport modelingmembrane filtration

Identifiers

PMID36363653
PMCPMC9694696
OpenAlexW4308203502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.