Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363607›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Monte Carlo Simulations for the Estimation of the Effective Permeability of Mixed-Matrix Membranes.

Zheng Cao, Boguslaw Kruczek, Jules Thibault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zheng CaoDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Boguslaw KruczekDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Jules ThibaultDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-3688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen the explosive development of mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) for a myriad of applications. In gas separation, it is desired to concurrently enhance the permeability, selectivity and physicochemical properties of the membrane. To help achieving these objectives, experimental characterization and predictive models can be used synergistically. In this investigation, a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm is proposed to rapidly and accurately estimate the relative permeability of ideal MMMs over a wide range of conditions. The difference in diffusivity coefficients between the polymer matrix and the filler particle is used to adjust the random progression of the migrating species inside each phase. The solubility coefficients of both phases at the polymer−filler interface are used to control the migration of molecules from one phase to the other in a way to achieve progressively phase equilibrium at the interface. Results for various MMMs were compared with the results obtained with the finite difference method under identical conditions, where the results from the finite difference method are used in this investigation as the benchmark method to test the accuracy of the Monte Carlo algorithm. Results were found to be very accurate (in general, <1% error) over a wide range of polymer and filler characteristics. The MC algorithm is simple and swift to implement and provides an accurate estimation of the relative permeability of ideal MMMs. The MC method can easily be extended to investigate more readily non-ideal MMMs with particle agglomeration, interfacial void, polymer-chain rigidification and/or pore blockage, and MMMs with any filler geometry.

Indexed as

finite difference simulationsmixed-matrix membrane (MMM)Monte Carlo simulationsrelative permeabilitysolubility

Identifiers

PMID36363607
PMCPMC9694028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.