Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363557›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Optimizing Concentration of Polyethelene Glycol for Exosome Isolation from Plasma for Downstream Application.

Marut Tangwattanachuleeporn, Phijitra Muanwien, Yothin Teethaisong, Poorichya Somparn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exosome isolation based on polyethylene glycol (PEG): a review.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marut TangwattanachuleepornFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20130, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7422-1135
Phijitra MuanwienFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20130, Thailand.
Yothin TeethaisongFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chon Buri 20130, Thailand.
Poorichya SomparnCenter of Excellence in Systems Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0387-8666
Burapha University · THChulalongkorn University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExosomes are ubiquitous extracellular nanovesicles secreted from almost all living cells that are thought to be involved in several important cellular processes, including cell-cell communication and signaling. Exosomes serve as a liquid biopsy tool for clinical and translational research. Although many techniques have been used to isolate exosomes, including ultracentrigation, size-exclusion chromatography, and immunocapturing-based techniques, these techniques are not convenient, they require expensive instrumentation, and they are unhandy for clinical samples. Precipitation techniques from available commercial kits that contain polyethelene glycol (PEG) are now widely used, but these kits are expensive, especially if a large number of biological samples are to be processed.

objectivethe purpose of this study is to compare and optimize the efficacy of different concentrations of PEG with two commercial kits ExoQuick (SBI) and Total Exosome Isolation (TEI) from Invitrogen in human plasma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: we determined exosome quantity, size distribution, marker expression, and downstream application.

resultsamong the precipitation methods, we found the size of particles and concentrations with 10-20% PEG are similar to ExoQuick and better than TEI. Interestingly, we detected cfDNA with ExoQuick and 10-20% PEG but not TEI and 5% PEG. Moreover, 10% PEG detection of miR-122 and miR-16 expression was superior to ExoQuick and TEI. Furthermore, in proteomics results it also found the identified proteins better than commercial kits but there was a high level of contamination of other proteins in serum.

conclusionstogether, these findings show that an optimal concentration of 10% PEG serves as a guide for use with clinical samples in exosome isolation for downstream applications.

Indexed as

ExosomesMicroRNAsBiomarkersGlycolsHumansProteomicsBiomarkersGlycolsMicroRNAscell free DNAexosomemiRNApolyethelene glycolproteomicsserum

Identifiers

PMID36363557
PMCPMC9694916
OpenAlexW4308437884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.