ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022
Could Artificial Intelligence Prevent Intraoperative Anaphylaxis? Reference Review and Proof of Concept.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Infraorbital-Infratrochlear Versus Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block for Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Clinical Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025Article
- Transforming Hospital Quality Improvement Through Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2024Article
- Applications and challenges of neural networks in otolaryngology (Review).Biomedical reports · 2024Review
- Integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Large Language Models in Nephrology: Advancing Practical Applications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- A Randomized Comparison of Multimodal Analgesia and Fentanyl-Based Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Women Undergoing Robot-Assisted Bilateral Axillary Breast Approach Thyroidectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Personalized Medicine: The Relevance of ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard AI in Nephrology Literature Searches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Recent Advances and Adaptive Strategies in Image Guidance for Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Gallbladder Pancreatic Heterotopia-The Importance of Diagnostic Imaging in Managing Intraoperative Findings.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Extracranial Facial Nerve Schwannoma-Histological Surprise or Therapeutic Planning?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Complete Intradural Interbody Cage Migration in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Labeling of Baropodometric Analysis Data Using Computer Vision Techniques in Classification of Foot Deformities.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drugs and various medical substances have been used for many decades to diagnose or treat diseases. Procedures like surgery and anesthesia (either local or general) use different pharmacological products during these events. In most of the cases, the procedure is safe and the physician performs the technique without incidents. Although they are safe for use, these substances (including drugs) may have adverse effects, varying from mild ones to life-threatening reactions in a minority of patients. Artificial intelligence may be a useful tool in approximating the risk of anaphylaxis before undertaking a medical procedure. This material presents these undesirable responses produced by medical products from a multidisciplinary point of view. Moreover, we present a proof of concept for using artificial intelligence as a possible guardship against intraoperative anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.