Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363462›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.

Wei Zeng, Yi Liu, Chuandong Wang, Changshun Yang, Shengtao Lin, Weihua Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The ELECLA trial: A multicentre randomised control trial on outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment on locally advanced colon cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei ZengShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4552-3302
Chuandong WangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Changshun YangDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Shengtao LinDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Weihua LiShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Increasing evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). However, its effectiveness remains controversial. This study explored the safety and efficacy of NAC combined with laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for LACC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 444 patients diagnosed with LACC (cT4 or cT3, with ≥5 mm invasion beyond the muscularis propria) in our hospital between 2012 and 2015. Propensity score matching (PSM; 1:2) was performed to compare patients treated with NAC and those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Results: Overall, 42 patients treated with NAC were compared with 402 patients who received only AC. After PSM, 42 patients in the NAC group were compared with 84 patients in the control group, with no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between groups. The pathological tumor sizes in the NAC group were significantly smaller than those in the AC group (3.1 ± 2.1 cm vs. 5.8 ± 2.5 cm). Patients in the NAC group had a significantly lower T stage than those in the AC group (p < 0.001). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a significant response was observed in four (9.6%) patients, with two (4.8%) showing a complete response. The 5-year overall survival rates (88.1% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.206) and 5-year disease-free survival rates (75.1% vs. 64.2%, p = 0.111) did not differ between the groups. However, the 5-year cumulative rate of distant recurrence was significantly lower in the NAC than in the AC group (9.6% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.022). Conclusions: NAC, combined with AC, could downstage primary tumors of LACC and seems safe and acceptable for patients with LACC, with a similar long-term survival between the two treatments.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomelocally advanced colon cancer (LACC)neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)preoperative treatmentpropensity score matchingsurvival

Identifiers

PMID36363462
PMCPMC9692337
OpenAlexW4307262491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.