Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363451›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Biomechanical Modelling for Tooth Survival Studies: Mechanical Properties, Loads and Boundary Conditions-A Narrative Review.

Saúl Dorado, Ana Arias, Jesus R Jimenez-Octavio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Novel Double Arrowhead Auxetic Dental Splint for Avulsed Tooth Reimplantation.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saúl DoradoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9927-6872
Ana AriasDepartment of Conservative and Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2270-8096
Jesus R Jimenez-OctavioInstituto de Investigación Tecnológica, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-8332
Universidad Pontificia Comillas · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

Comillas Pontifical University PP2021_08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent biomechanical studies have focused on studying the response of teeth before and after different treatments under functional and parafunctional loads. These studies often involve experimental and/or finite element analysis (FEA). Current loading and boundary conditions may not entirely represent the real condition of the tooth in clinical situations. The importance of homogenizing both sample characterization and boundary conditions definition for future dental biomechanical studies is highlighted. The mechanical properties of dental structural tissues are presented, along with the effect of functional and parafunctional loads and other environmental and biological parameters that may influence tooth survival. A range of values for Young's modulus, Poisson ratio, compressive strength, threshold stress intensity factor and fracture toughness are provided for enamel and dentin; as well as Young's modulus and Poisson ratio for the PDL, trabecular and cortical bone. Angles, loading magnitude and frequency are provided for functional and parafunctional loads. The environmental and physiological conditions (age, gender, tooth, humidity, etc.), that may influence tooth survival are also discussed. Oversimplifications of biomechanical models could end up in results that divert from the natural behavior of teeth. Experimental validation models with close-to-reality boundary conditions should be developed to compare the validity of simplified models.

Indexed as

bitingbruxismcharacterizationclenchingexperimentalFEAmodelling

Identifiers

PMID36363451
PMCPMC9657341
OpenAlexW4308527113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.