Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363435›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Numerical Analysis of Zirconium and Titanium Implants under the Effect of Critical Masticatory Load.

Miguel Martinez-Mondragon, Guillermo Urriolagoitia-Sosa, Beatriz Romero-Ángeles, Daniel Maya-Anaya, Jacobo Martínez-Reyes, Francisco Javier Gallegos-Funes, Guillermo Manuel Urriolagoitia-Calderón

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel Martinez-MondragonBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4668-4551
Guillermo Urriolagoitia-SosaBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.
Beatriz Romero-ÁngelesBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.
Daniel Maya-AnayaBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.
Jacobo Martínez-ReyesBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-440X
Francisco Javier Gallegos-FunesBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4854-6438
Guillermo Manuel Urriolagoitia-CalderónBiomechanics Group, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigacion, Unidad Profesional Adolfo López Mateos. Edificio 5, 2do. Piso, Col. Lindavista, Del. Gustavo A. Madero, Ciudad de México 07300, Mexico.
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental implants have become an alternative to replace the teeth of people suffering from edentulous and meet the physiological and morphological characteristics (recovering 95% of the chewing function). The evolution and innovation of biomaterials for dental implants have had a trajectory that dates back to prehistory, where dental pieces were replaced by ivory or seashells, to the present day, where they are replaced by metallic materials such as titanium or ceramics such as zirconium or fiberglass. The numerical evaluation focuses on comparing the stress distribution and general displacement between different dental implants and a healthy tooth when applying a force of 850 N. For the analysis, a model of the anatomical structure was developed of a healthy tooth considering three essential parts of the tooth (enamel, dentin, and pulp). The tooth biomodel was established through computed tomography. Three dental implant models were considered by changing the geometry of the abutment. A structural simulation was carried out by applying the finite element method (FEM). In addition, the material considered for the analyses was zirconium oxide (ZrO2), which was compared against titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V). The analyses were considered with linear, isotropic, and homogeneous properties. The variables included in the biomodeling were the modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, density, and elastic limit. The results obtained from the study indicated a significant difference in the biomechanical behavior of the von Mises forces and the displacement between the healthy tooth and the titanium and zirconium implant models. However, the difference between the titanium implant and the zirconium implant is minimal because one is more rigid, and the other is more tenacious.

Indexed as

abutmentbiomodel developmentdental implantstructural numerical analysistomography

Identifiers

PMID36363435
PMCPMC9657110
OpenAlexW4308527949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.