ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Mixture Optimization of Cementitious Materials Using Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Algorithms: State of the Art and Future Prospects.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning based optimization of fly ash content for improving geopolymer concrete compressive strength.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimized Design of Low-Carbon Mix Ratio for Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II Concrete Based on Genetic Algorithm-Improved Back Propagation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Waste on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete and Evaluation of Its Feasibility for Reuse in Concrete Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hybrid optimization of modern cementitious materials requires concrete to meet many competing objectives (e.g., mechanical properties, cost, workability, environmental requirements, and durability). This paper reviews the current literature on optimizing mixing ratios using machine learning and metaheuristic optimization algorithms based on past studies on varying methods. In this review, we first discuss the conventional methods for mixing optimization of cementitious materials. Then, the problem expression of hybrid optimization is discussed, including decision variables, constraints, machine learning algorithms for modeling objectives, and metaheuristic optimization algorithms for searching the best mixture ratio. Finally, we explore the development prospects of this field, including, expanding the database by combining field data, considering more influencing variables, and considering more competitive targets in the production of functional cemented materials. In addition, to overcome the limitation of the swarm intelligence-based multi-objective optimization (MOO) algorithm in hybrid optimization, this paper proposes a new MOO algorithm based on individual intelligence (multi-objective beetle antenna search algorithm). The development of computationally efficient robust MOO models will continue to make progress in the field of hybrid optimization. This review is adapted for engineers and researchers who want to optimize the mixture proportions of cementitious materials using machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.