ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Response of Apple Flesh to Compression under the Quasi-Static and Impact Loading Conditions.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viscoelastic Characteristics of Potato Tissue Based on Stress Relaxation Tests.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mechanical Resistance of New Apple Genotypes for Automated Harvesting.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanical Properties of Sugar Beet Roots under Impact Loading Conditions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect on physiological properties of banana fruit based on pendulum impact test and storage.Current research in food science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compression tests of cylindrical samples were carried out using two 'Rubin' and 'Red Jonaprince' apple cultivars with flesh firmness differing in a statistically significant way. The tests were conducted under both the quasi-static and impact loading conditions, which required the use of two test stands. For this purpose, an impact measuring stand was designed and built. The tests proved that the firmness of the apple flesh influenced the mechanical response under both the quasi-static and impact loading conditions. The elasticity modulus had much higher values under the impact than quasi-static loading conditions. This indicates that the stiffness of the apple tissue was larger during the impact than at the low-speed compression. Different failure mechanisms of cylindrical apple flesh samples were found depending on the loading conditions. Under the quasi-static loading conditions, the apples of both cultivars were damaged at the same strain value. However, during the impact, apples were apt to damage at a constant stress value regardless of the firmness of the tested cultivar. The toughness of the apple tissue depended on firmness and was larger under the quasi-static loading conditions for the apples with larger firmness. However, under the impact loading conditions, the toughness was greater for the apples with smaller firmness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.