ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Review of Lightweight Self-Healing Concrete.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting self-healing efficiency in recycled aggregate concrete using optimized machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cementitious composites often crack because of their low tensile strength. The ability of self-healing cementitious composite to automatically repair cracks has attracted widespread attention. Lightweight aggregate (LWA) has a low density and a high porosity which can provide storage space for a healing agent. The healing mechanisms and healing compositions of lightweight self-healing concrete (LWSHC) have been summarized in this research. The workability, compressive strength, crack repairing, and durability of LWSHC performance is also illustrated. A LWA with interconnected pores and a high strength should be integrated into LWSHC to increase the crack closure rate and mechanical properties. Expanded perlite is the most suitable LWA carrier for bioremediation. The chemical healing agents are better than the biological healing agents at present since the biological healing agents have more negative effects. A sodium silicate solution is a good choice as a chemical healing agent. Vacuum conditions, high-temperature processing, and the use of coating technologies on LWAs can improve the healing effect of LWSHC. The addition of fibers also enhance the self-healing ability of LWSHC. Further, the use of numerical simulation supports the healing performance of LWSHC. The goal of this research is to investigate the most appropriate component of LWSHC to ensure a high crack closure rate, strength healing ratio, and great durability while being lightweight. It can then be adopted in high-rise and large-span concrete structures to extend the service life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.