Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36363102›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Influence of Replacing Cement with Waste Glass on Mechanical Properties of Concrete.

Özer Zeybek, Yasin Onuralp Özkılıç, Memduh Karalar, Ali İhsan Çelik, Shaker Qaidi, Jawad Ahmad, Dumitru Doru Burduhos-Nergis, Diana Petronela Burduhos-Nergis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
17.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Özer ZeybekDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla 48000, Turkey.
Yasin Onuralp ÖzkılıçDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya 42000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-4784
Memduh KaralarDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak 67100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4595-8971
Ali İhsan ÇelikDepartment of Construction, Tomarza Mustafa Akincioglu Vocational School, Kayseri University, Kayseri 38940, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-7647
Shaker QaidiDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Duhok, Duhok 42001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-4877
Jawad AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, Military College of Engineering (NUST), Risalpur 24080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-7158
Dumitru Doru Burduhos-NergisFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2716-1328
Diana Petronela Burduhos-NergisFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0680-9885
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași · ROBülent Ecevit University · TRKayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRMuğla University · TRNational University of Sciences and Technology · PKNawroz University · IQNecmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

This work was supported by Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi-TUIASI-Romania, Scientific Research Funds FCSU-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the effect of waste glass on the mechanical properties of concrete was examined by conducting a series of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and flexural strength tests. According to this aim, waste glass powder (WGP) was first used as a partial replacement for cement and six different ratios of WGP were utilized in concrete production: 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%. To examine the combined effect of different ratios of WGP on concrete performance, mixed samples (10%, 20%, 30%) were then prepared by replacing cement, and fine and coarse aggregates with both WGP and crashed glass particles. Workability and slump values of concrete produced with different amounts of waste glass were determined on the fresh state of concrete, and these properties were compared with those of plain concrete. For the hardened concrete, 150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm cubic specimens and cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 100 mm and a height of 200 mm were tested to identify the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of the concrete produced with waste glass. Next, a three-point bending test was carried out on samples with dimensions of 100 × 100 × 400 mm, and a span length of 300 mm to obtain the flexure behavior of different mixtures. According to the results obtained, a 20% substitution of WGP as cement can be considered the optimum dose. On the other hand, for concrete produced with combined WGP and crashed glass particles, mechanical properties increased up to a certain limit and then decreased owing to poor workability. Thus, 10% can be considered the optimum replacement level, as combined waste glass shows considerably higher strength and better workability properties. Furthermore, scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was performed to investigate the microstructure of the composition. Good adhesion was observed between the waste glass and cementitious concrete. Lastly, practical empirical equations have been developed to determine the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and flexure strength of concrete with different amounts of waste glass. Instead of conducting an experiment, these strength values of the concrete produced with glass powder can be easily estimated at the design stage with the help of proposed expressions.

Indexed as

compressive strengtheco-friendly concreteflexural strengthsplitting tensile strengthwaste glassworkability

Identifiers

PMID36363102
PMCPMC9658567
OpenAlexW4307549822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.