Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362956›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Microsurgical Reconstruction in Orthopedic Tumor Resections as Part of a Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach for Sarcomas of the Extremities.

Georgios Koulaxouzidis, Paul Schlagnitweit, Conrad Anderl, David Braig, Sven Märdian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgios KoulaxouzidisDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Congregational Hospital Linz, Sisters of Mercy, 4010 Linz, Austria.
Paul SchlagnitweitDepartment of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Congregational Hospital Linz, Sisters of Mercy, 4010 Linz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2704-4591
Conrad AnderlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Congregational Hospital Linz, Sisters of Mercy, 4010 Linz, Austria.
David BraigDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Sven MärdianCentre for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Insitute of Health, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4220-2797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central element of modern sarcoma therapy is complete surgical tumor resection with an adequate safety margin, embedded in an interdisciplinary multimodal therapy concept. Along with ensuring patient survival, functional limb preservation is an important goal for sarcomas of the extremities. This review provides an overview of the relevant literature on indications and goals of reconstructive options, the scope and contribution of microsurgical reconstructive procedures, and the associated interdisciplinary decision making and workup. Furthermore, the impact of (neo)-adjuvant therapy on reconstructive decisions will be highlighted. These aspects will be illustrated by four comprehensive case studies that demonstrate both useful strategies and the need for individually tailored therapies. Nowadays, extremity-preserving therapy is possible in more than 90% of sarcomas. Technical and procedural innovations such as microsurgery and microsurgical reconstructive procedures have significantly contributed to this evolution of therapy.

Indexed as

extremityflaplimb salvage surgerymicrosurgeryreconstructionreconstructive surgerysarcoma

Identifiers

PMID36362956
PMCPMC9695779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.