ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Combined Deep Learning Techniques for Mandibular Fracture Diagnosis Assistance.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-based diagnosis for facial fractures, advantages compared with conventional imaging diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of an AI-based segmentation model for mandibular fracture segmentation on CBCT using volumetric and 2D slice-based validation approaches.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Automated deep learning detection of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in maxillary incisors on panoramic radiographs.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based fractured tooth detection in occlusal radiographs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The current landscape of artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial surgery- a narrative review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Review
- Detecting Mandible Fractures in CBCT Scans Using a 3-Stage Neural Network.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
- Detection and classification of mandibular fractures in panoramic radiography using artificial intelligence.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of deep learning and convolutional neural network algorithms for mandibular fracture detection using radiographic images: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Review
- Article
- "Air Sign" in Misdiagnosed Mandibular Fractures Based on CT and CBCT Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A review on artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of fractures in facial trauma imaging.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mandibular fractures are the most common fractures in dentistry. Since diagnosing a mandibular fracture is difficult when only panoramic radiographic images are used, most doctors use cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to identify the patient's fracture location. In this study, considering the diagnosis of mandibular fractures using the combined deep learning technique, YOLO and U-Net were used as auxiliary diagnostic methods to detect the location of mandibular fractures based on panoramic images without CBCT. In a previous study, mandibular fracture diagnosis was performed using YOLO learning; in the detection performance result of the YOLOv4-based mandibular fracture diagnosis module, the precision score was approximately 97%, indicating that there was almost no misdiagnosis. In particular, fractures in the symphysis, body, angle, and ramus tend to be distributed in the middle of the mandible. Owing to the irregular fracture types and overlapping location information, the recall score was approximately 79%, which increased the detection of undiagnosed fractures. In many cases, fractures that are clearly visible to the human eye cannot be grasped. To overcome these shortcomings, the number of undiagnosed fractures can be reduced using a combination of the U-Net and YOLOv4 learning modules. U-Net is advantageous for the segmentation of fractures spread over a wide area because it performs semantic segmentation. Consequently, the undiagnosed case in the middle of the mandible, where YOLO was weak, was somewhat supplemented by the U-Net module. The precision score of the combined module was 95%, similar to that of the previous method, and the recall score improved to 87%, as the number of undiagnosed cases was reduced. Through this study, the performance of a deep learning method that can be used for the diagnosis of the mandibular bone has been improved, and it is anticipated that as an auxiliary diagnostic inspection device, it will assist dentists in making diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.