Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362794›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

The Clinicopathological Distinction between Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy and Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy R2: Key Points to Prevent Misdiagnosis.

Mengge Yang, Suqiong Ji, Li Xu, Qing Zhang, Yue Li, Huajie Gao, Bitao Bu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. From Doubt to Diagnosis: Canadian Patient Perspectives on a Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Diagnosis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mengge YangDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Suqiong JiDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Li XuDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Yue LiDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Huajie GaoDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Bitao BuDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limb−girdle muscular dystrophy R2 (LGMD R2) is most frequently misdiagnosed as immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological data of IMNM and LGMD R2 to find distinguishing features. Methods: We retrospectively reassessed the medical data of patients with IMNM (n = 41) and LGMD R2 (n = 8) treated at Tongji Hospital from January 2017 to December 2021. Results: In our cohort, patients with LGMD R2 had a longer interval of onset to first visit, mild muscle weakness with late upper limb involvement, less myalgia, no cervical muscle weakness or dysphagia, no extramuscular organs affected except cardiac involvement, and lack of various autoantibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies. These features were completely reversed in IMNM. Moreover, thigh MRIs showed that muscle edema prominently affecting the adductor magnus was a characteristic of IMNM, while extensive fatty replacement was more common in LGMD R2 (p = 0.0086). Necrotic myofibers presented in both entities (p = 0.1693), while features such as ring/whorled and splitting myofibers were more often found in LGMD R2 (p = 0.0112 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Conversely, sarcoplasmic p62 expression was more pronounced in IMNM (p < 0.05). There were 4 of 8 (50%) patients with LGMD R2 initially considered as seronegative IMNM, and therefore unnecessarily treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Insufficient recognition of the early clinical, imaging, and histopathological features of LGMD R2 is the main reason for misdiagnosis. Conclusions: These findings may help clinicians differentiate seronegative IMNM and LGMD R2, reducing early misdiagnosis and mismanagement. Particularly, prominent adductor magnus edema on MRI and abundant p62 staining seem to be good markers for IMNM, while the presence of splitting myofibers is a crucial clue to early hereditary myopathy, including LGMD R2.

Indexed as

clinical featureshistopathologyimagingimmune-mediated necrotizing myopathylimb–girdle muscular dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID36362794
PMCPMC9655252
OpenAlexW4308509858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.