Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362685›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Deep Learning for Improving the Effectiveness of Routine Prenatal Screening for Major Congenital Heart Diseases.

Siti Nurmaini, Radiyati Umi Partan, Nuswil Bernolian, Ade Iriani Sapitri, Bambang Tutuko, Muhammad Naufal Rachmatullah, Annisa Darmawahyuni, Firdaus Firdaus, Johanes C Mose

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siti NurmainiIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8024-2952
Radiyati Umi PartanInternal Medicine, Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang 30126, Indonesia.
Nuswil BernolianDivision of Fetomaternal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital, Palembang 30126, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-0074
Ade Iriani SapitriIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.
Bambang TutukoIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.
Muhammad Naufal RachmatullahIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.
Annisa DarmawahyuniIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0229-5717
Firdaus FirdausIntelligent System Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang 30139, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-2791-3486
Johanes C MoseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Padjajaran University, Bandung 45363, Indonesia.
Sriwijaya University · IDPadjadjaran University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early prenatal screening with an ultrasound (US) can significantly lower newborn mortality caused by congenital heart diseases (CHDs). However, the need for expertise in fetal cardiologists and the high volume of screening cases limit the practically achievable detection rates. Hence, automated prenatal screening to support clinicians is desirable. This paper presents and analyses potential deep learning (DL) techniques to diagnose CHDs in fetal USs. Four convolutional neural network architectures were compared to select the best classifier with satisfactory results. Hence, dense convolutional network (DenseNet) 201 architecture was selected for the classification of seven CHDs, such as ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, atrioventricular septal defect, Ebstein's anomaly, tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and a normal control. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the DenseNet201 model were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for the intra-patient scenario and 99%, 97%, and 98%, respectively, for the inter-patient scenario. We used the intra-patient DL prediction model to validate our proposed model against the prediction results of three expert fetal cardiologists. The proposed model produces a satisfactory result, which means that our model can support expert fetal cardiologists to interpret the decision to improve CHD diagnostics. This work represents a step toward the goal of assisting front-line sonographers with CHD diagnoses at the population level.

Indexed as

classificationcongenital heart diseasedeep learningexplainable AIfetal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36362685
PMCPMC9653675
OpenAlexW4307989357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.