Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362640›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Avoiding the Removal of Syndesmotic Screws after Distal Tibiofibular Diastasis Repair: A Benefit or a Drawback?

Samer Hosin, Dinu Vermesan, Radu Prejbeanu, Dan Crisan, Musab Al-Qatawneh, Daniel Pop, Mihai Mioc, Felix Bratosin, Bogdan Feciche, Kakarla Hemaswini and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samer HosinDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Dinu VermesanDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Radu PrejbeanuDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Dan CrisanDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Musab Al-QatawnehDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Daniel PopDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Mihai MiocDepartment of Orthopedics, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9381-6871
Felix BratosinMethodological and Infectious Diseases Research Center, Department of Infectious Diseases, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4711-4315
Bogdan FecicheDepartment of Urology, Satu-Mare County Emergency Hospital, Strada Ravensburg 2, 440192 Satu-Mare, Romania.
Kakarla HemaswiniMalla Reddy Institute of Medical Sciences, Suraram Main Road 138, Hyderabad 500055, India.
Marius Liviu MoiseDepartment of Radiology, "Premiere" Hospital-"Regina Maria", Calea Aradului 113, 300643 Timisoara, Romania.
Catalin DumitruDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Premiere" Hospital-"Regina Maria", Calea Aradului 113, 300643 Timisoara, Romania.
Vlad BloancaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Ciprian Nicolae PilutMultidisciplinary Research Center on Antimicrobial Resistance (MULTI-REZ), Microbiology Department, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is still no general agreement about the most effective form of syndesmosis fixation with syndesmotic screws for patients affected by ankle fractures that are accompanied by syndesmotic injuries. In the same manner, no consensus has been reached yet on whether or not the tibiofibular syndesmotic screw is more beneficial if removed or not, as well as the exact timing of removal if this proves superiority. The purpose of this research was to verify whether or not removing syndesmotic screws reduces the risk of developing a diastasis and compare outcomes in patients whose syndesmotic screw was or was not removed at all. A retrospective observational study was carried out to cover a period of five years and a computed sample size of almost 300 cases. Patients were included in the current study if their history was positive for ankle fracture with distal tibiofibular diastasis repair with syndesmotic screws. Loss of reduction was more frequent after screw removal (8.5% vs. 2.1%), although the quality of reduction was generally excellent in both groups. The mean AOFAS score was significantly better in patients who had their tibiofibular screw removed (92.6 vs. 88.4), but the tibiofibular clear space and incisura fibularis depth widened more following the second intervention (3.8 mm vs. 3.6 mm, and, respectively, 4.3 vs. 4.1). Lastly, the same patients with tibiofibular screw removal had a significantly higher cost of total interventions and more days of medical leave (21 vs. 15 days on average). It seems that a strong conclusion in favor of removing or not removing syndesmotic screws after distal tibiofibular diastasis repair cannot be given. However, several radiographic findings lean toward the benefit of those patients whose tibiofibular screws were not removed, although mobility was notably better after the screw was removed. Furthermore, treatment expenses are greatly lowered if a subsequent operation for screw removal is avoided, as well as if individuals who have a single surgery take a shorter medical leave.

Indexed as

ankle fractureankle instabilityfoot disordersorthopedic managementtibiofibular diastasis

Identifiers

PMID36362640
PMCPMC9659076
OpenAlexW4307945156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.