Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362638›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

Establishing the Optimal Time for Induction of Labor in Women with Diet-Controlled Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Patrik Šimják, Hana Krejčí, Markéta Hornová, Miloš Mráz, Antonín Pařízek, Michal Kršek, Martin Haluzík, Kateřina Anderlová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obstetric cholestasis and its impact on the maternal outcome.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrik ŠimjákDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0811-2085
Hana KrejčíDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Markéta HornováDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Miloš MrázDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Antonín PařízekDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Michal Kršek3rd Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin HaluzíkDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 140 21 Prague, Czech Republic.
Kateřina AnderlováDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the optimal week for labor induction in women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus by comparing differences in perinatal and neonatal outcomes of labor induction to expectant management at different gestational weeks. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort of 797 singleton pregnancies complicated by diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus that were diagnosed, treated, and delivered after 37 weeks in a tertiary, university-affiliated perinatal center between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: The incidence of neonatal complications was highest when delivery occurred at 37 weeks, whereas fetal macrosomia occurred mostly at 41 weeks (20.7%); the frequency of large for gestational age infants did not differ between the groups. Conversely, the best neonatal outcomes were observed at 40 weeks due to the lowest number of neonates requiring phototherapy for neonatal jaundice (1.7%) and the smallest proportion of neonates experiencing composite adverse neonatal outcomes defined as neonatal hypoglycemia, phototherapy, clavicle fracture, or umbilical artery pH < 7.15 (10.4%). Compared with expectant management, the risk for neonatal hypoglycemia was increased for induction at 39 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 12.29, 95% confidence interval 1.35−111.75, p = 0.026) and that for fetal macrosomia was decreased for induction at 40 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.01−0.92, p = 0.041), after adjusting for maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index, nulliparity, and mean pregnancy A1c. Conclusions: The lowest rate of neonatal complications was observed at 40 weeks. Labor induction at 40 weeks prevented fetal macrosomia.

Indexed as

cesarean sectiondiet-controlexpectant managementgestational diabetes mellituslabor induction

Identifiers

PMID36362638
PMCPMC9657511
OpenAlexW4307939995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.