Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36362531›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2022

DeepThal: A Deep Learning-Based Framework for the Large-Scale Prediction of the α

Krittaya Phirom, Phasit Charoenkwan, Watshara Shoombuatong, Pimlak Charoenkwan, Supatra Sirichotiyakul, Theera Tongsong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krittaya PhiromDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Phasit CharoenkwanModern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Watshara ShoombuatongCenter of Data Mining and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3394-8709
Pimlak CharoenkwanDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-9177
Supatra SirichotiyakulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Theera TongsongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-6478
Chiang Mai University · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

Chiang Mai University CMU-2566Thailand Research Fund DPG6280003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a machine learning (ML)-based framework using red blood cell (RBC) parameters for the prediction of the α+-thalassemia trait (α+-thal trait) and to compare the diagnostic performance with a conventional method using a single RBC parameter or a combination of RBC parameters. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on possible couples at risk for fetus with hemoglobin H (Hb H disease). Subjects with molecularly confirmed normal status (not thalassemia), α+-thal trait, and two-allele α-thalassemia mutation were included. Clinical parameters (age and gender) and RBC parameters (Hb, Hct, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, and RBC count) obtained from their antenatal thalassemia screen were retrieved and analyzed using a machine learning (ML)-based framework and a conventional method. The performance of α+-thal trait prediction was evaluated. Results: In total, 594 cases (female/male: 330/264, mean age: 29.7 ± 6.6 years) were included in the analysis. There were 229 normal controls, 160 cases with the α+-thalassemia trait, and 205 cases in the two-allele α-thalassemia mutation category, respectively. The ML-derived model improved the diagnostic performance, giving a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 81%. The experimental results indicated that DeepThal achieved a better performance compared with other ML-based methods in terms of the independent test dataset, with an accuracy of 80.77%, sensitivity of 70.59%, and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.608. Of all the red blood cell parameters, MCH < 28.95 pg as a single parameter had the highest performance in predicting the α+-thal trait with the AUC of 0.857 and 95% CI of 0.816−0.899. The combination model derived from the binary logistic regression analysis exhibited improved performance with the AUC of 0.868 and 95% CI of 0.830−0.906, giving a sensitivity of 80.1% and specificity of 75.1%. Conclusions: The performance of DeepThal in terms of the independent test dataset is sufficient to demonstrate that DeepThal is capable of accurately predicting the α+-thal trait. It is anticipated that DeepThal will be a useful tool for the scientific community in the large-scale prediction of the α+-thal trait.

Indexed as

alpha plus-thalassemiahemoglobin H diseasemachine learningred blood cell indicesscreening

Identifiers

PMID36362531
PMCPMC9654007
OpenAlexW4307291891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.